Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Panel Discussion rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Panel Discussion
Panel Discussion
Students divided into two groups debate a controversial subject. They are assigned roles including constructive speaker, questioner and rebuttal speaker
Rubric Code:
ZX89W43
By
ctempier
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
(General)
Type:
Presentation
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Panel Discussion
100 %
Enter rubric description
Exceptional
20 pts
Good
18 pts
Satisfactory
15 pts
Poor
10 pts
Unacceptable
5 pts
Respect for other Panelists
20 %
Exceptional
Panelist is enthusiastic without being abrasive or inconsiderate. He or she plays a leading role in collaboration and inspires effective team efforts. Never interrupts. Models courtesy and civility for peers.
Good
Panelist shows respect for other panelists, never interrupting.
Satisfactory
Panelists show respect for other panelists.
Poor
Panelist does not contribute actively to their team, or demonstrates a lack of cooperation or respect.
Unacceptable
Panelist is blatantly disrespectful or speaks out of turn. Behavior during event significantly detracts from the effectiveness of any presentation.
Analysis and Information
20 %
Enter description
Exceptional
Panelist is clearly well-informed about all issues.
All arguments stated are cogent and convincing. Critical thinking is displayed to an exceptional degree.
Good
Many valid points are raised and clearly analyzed with many indications of higher-level critical thought and consistent efforts to provide appropriate support for claims made.
Satisfactory
Panelist generally shows appreciation for the need to express and defend valid arguments, and seems to know how to distinguish them.
Poor
Panelist demonstrates inadequate efforts to reason carefully regarding the issues under discussion.
Unacceptable
No effort is apparent to analyze the topic, help form valid conclusions or offer valuable information.
Organization
20 %
Enter description
Exceptional
Panelist's presentation is always easy for the audience to follow. Clear patterns of organization are referred to explicitly. Statements of position, questions and rebuttal points are mutually consistent in all cases.
Good
Organization of ideas is generally easy to follow and no major inconsistencies are apparent. Some relevant contrasts with opposing side are made. Most speaking time is effectively used. Speaker seems well prepared and persuades effectively.
Satisfactory
Organization of ideas is sometimes in doubt, but responses are generally relevant and responsive, and clarifications are attempted.
Poor
Needless and significant confusion is introduced into the discussion, but course corrections succeed in clarifying the issues.
Unacceptable
No coherent organization is apparent, and/or questions or responses are clearly irrelevant or non-responsive.
Attentive Listening
20 %
Exceptional
Panelist continuously demonstrates active listening and full comprehension of opposing ideas through accurate re-statement. Advances the ideas of other panelists. Questions, reactions to questions, rebuttals and ready reception of constructive feedback all clearly demonstrate that active listening has occurred throughout.
Good
Panelist offers some more or less accurate re-statements of opposing positions and always demonstrates attentive listening to others. Panelist respectfully absorbs all contributions and feedback from others.
Satisfactory
Some responses indicate a gap in attentive listening, but these are rectified or do not seriously interfere.
Poor
Questions, answers or responses suggest serious flaws in attentive listening.
Unacceptable
Attentive listening has obviously not occurred, in a manner seriously detrimental to team or panel discussion as a whole.
Delivery
20 %
Exceptional
All components of effective and persuasive delivery are present at all times, including projection, inflection, rate, eye contact, fluency, and body language.
Good
Effective and persuasive public speaking skills are almost always present.
Satisfactory
Public speaking skills are under-developed in noticeable ways, but strengths in other areas compensate for these weaknesses.
Poor
Panelist is over-reliant on notes or often inaudible. Makes little effort to persuade or connect with audience.
Unacceptable
No components of effective public speaking are noticeable or the discourse is plainly unintelligible.
Subjects:
(General)
Types:
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More (General) rubrics
More Presentation rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n60
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.