Skip to main content

iRubric: Emerging Infectious Disease Presentations rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Emerging Infectious Disease Presentations Infectious Disease Final Project 2014 Your presentations should be 20 minutes long, with all figures, images, and data referenced at the end of the talk. Be prepared to do your talk in either powerpoint or keynote. You will be graded on: content covered, clarity of your talk, ability to answer follow-up questions, and the quality of research. Rubric Code: Z5B247 By robertse8 Draft Public Rubric Subject: Biology Type: Presentation Grade Levels: 9-12, Graduate

Infectous Disease Presentation
	WOW!!! Great Job! 1.5 pts	Meets Expectations 1 pts	Needs Improvement 0.5 pts	Enter Title 0 pts
Content	WOW!!! Great Job! The project engages and informs the audience in a creative professional manner, establishes focus, and uses appropriate tone and style. Presentation is interesting to the audience	Meets Expectations The project engages and informs the majority of the audience, and adequately uses appropriate tone and style and is somewhat interesting to the audience.	Needs Improvement The project fails to interest, engage and inform the audience, and uses inappropriate tone and style. Student is uncomfortable with the information and read from screen.	Enter Title Student read text from screen and did not present professional demeanor.
Quality of Research	WOW!!! Great Job! Provides elaborate evidence of researched content through demonstrations such as illustrations, details, and visual aids without excess text. No more than 4 slides used	Meets Expectations Provides effective illustration and visual aids to demonstrate comprehension. 3-5 slides included	Needs Improvement Has limited incorporation of effective visual aids. Too few or too many slides limit effectiveness.	Enter Title No slides or 1 or two slides of little use to presentation.
Fluency	WOW!!! Great Job! The student demonstrates comprehensive subject knowledge by elaboration and clarity of presentation, and by answering questions with detailed understanding including reference material.	Meets Expectations The student demonstrates subject knowledge through a clear presentation with some elaboration and is able to answer questions with explanation.	Needs Improvement The student is uncomfortable with subject matter and may lack elaboration and/or clarity. Lacking in detailed understanding.	Enter Title Member clearly does not have any knowledge of subject matter
Clarity of talk	WOW!!! Great Job! The presentation is practiced and presented in a professional manner that indicates a great deal of time was spent prepping.	Meets Expectations The presentation is practiced and presented in a manner that generally shows that some time was spent prepping.	Needs Improvement The presentation lacks evidence of quality time was spent prepping.	Enter Title member did research without collaboration as isolated add on to project
Quality of slides	WOW!!! Great Job! No errors	Meets Expectations 1-2 errors	Needs Improvement 3-6 errors	Enter Title multiple errors
References	WOW!!! Great Job! Member included information in presentation from 2 or more reading or reference from peer reviewed journals as well as at least 3 other sources	Meets Expectations Member included information in presentation from one eading or reference from peer reviewed journals as well as at least 3 other sources	Needs Improvement Member did not use a reference from peer reviewed journal. Did cite other sources	Enter Title No references cited
Ability to answer questions	WOW!!! Great Job! Member includes a clear explanation of and how a specific technology has been used to study his/her aspect of the disease.	Meets Expectations Member includes a reference to a specific technology has been used to study his/her aspect of the disease but may not provide a thorough explanation of the technology or how it was applied.	Needs Improvement Member does not reference to a specific technology has been used to study his/her aspect of the disease or the reference is poorly explained.	Enter Title no technology reference
Adheres to Time Limit	WOW!!! Great Job! 20 minutes or more	Meets Expectations 16-19 minutes	Needs Improvement 11-15 minutes	Enter Title 10 minutes or less

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Biology rubrics

More Project rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n178