Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Extended Investigation & Scientific Poster Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Extended Investigation & Scientific Poster Rubric
Scoring Rubric for Scientific Project Poster
This rubric shows the expected aspects of the scientific poster and research documents.
Rubric Code:
YX69BCW
By
loonyloub
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Science
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
9-12, Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Criterion
Substandard
1 pts
Poor
2 pts
Fair
3 pts
Good
4 pts
Excellent
5 pts
Layout / navigation of display
Substandard
Poster layout is difficult to follow
Poor
Poster is organized in vertical columns; however, sections are not sequenced logically
Fair
Poster is organized in vertical columns and sequence of sections is appropriate
Good
Poster is organized in vertical columns and sequence or flow of informations is appropriate; however, space is incorrectly allocated to unimportant information
Excellent
Poster is organized in vertical columns and sequence or flow of information is appropriate<BR>
<BR>
Important sections are given more space
Overall visual appeal of display
Substandard
Excessive use of text with little or no graphics<BR>
<BR>
Font is too small
Poor
Appropriate use of graphics and text; however, font is too small
Fair
Appealing combination of graphics and text; however, color or background picture is distracting or not suitable<BR>
<BR>
Appropriate font (visible from 1 - 1.5m away) used
Good
Appropriate use of graphics and text, but little color or few pictures<BR>
<BR>
Appropriate font (visible from 1 - 1.5m away)
Excellent
Appealing combination of graphics and text<BR>
<BR>
Appropriate font (visible from 1 - 1.5m away) used<BR>
<BR>
Color is used to emphasize and does not distract
Language usage
Substandard
Inappropriate/inconsistent tense used<BR>
<BR>
Many spelling, punctuation, or grammatical errors
Poor
Inappropriate/inconsistent tense used<BR>
<BR>
A few spelling, punctuation, or grammatical errors
Fair
Appropriate/consistent tense used<BR>
<BR>
No spelling or punctuation errors, but grammatical errors are present
Good
Appropriate/consistent tense used<BR>
<BR>
All grammar and spelling correct, but poor readability
Excellent
Appropriate/consistent tense is used<BR>
<BR>
All grammar and spelling correct with high readability
Use of scientific terminology
Substandard
Language is informal
Poor
Language demonstrates basic knowledge from the core scientific disciplines; however, there is some incorrect use of scientific terms
Fair
Language demonstrates basic knowledge from the core scientific disciplines; however, there is excessive use of jargon and/or acronyms are not defined
Good
Language demonstrates basic knowledge from the core scientific disciplines<BR>
<BR>
Appropriate use of jargon, but acronyms are not defined
Excellent
Language demonstrates basic knowledge from the core scientific disciplines<BR>
<BR>
Jargon is minimized and all acronyms are defined
Research question
Substandard
Research question, problem statement, or hypothesis is not provided
Poor
A vague, untestable research question is provided
Fair
Question is testable, but not clear
Good
Hypothesis is testable and understandable<BR>
<BR>
May or may not be written as a null hypothesis or specify what variables are being measured or analyzed
Excellent
Research question is written as a testable relationship and includes the specific variables<BR>
<BR>
Includes a null hypothesis which specifies exactly what variables are to be measured and analyzed
Scientific Information
Substandard
Provides information unrelated to the study
Poor
Some relevant information is given, but there is important information missing.
Fair
Provides information related to the study for each section, but gives too much (or too little) information and/or is not appropriately referenced
Good
Provides adequate background for each section using a broad range of resources.
Excellent
Presents significance of research in the form of a well structured, logical progression of ideas.
Data, graphics & visuals
Substandard
No data, graphics or visuals provided
Poor
Data and/or graphics and/or visuals provided, however they do not enhance the information presented.
Fair
Some Data and/or graphics and/or visuals used, but they are not organised or labelled effectively.
Good
Data and/or graphics and/or visuals shown in various formats, but more organisation would assist readability.
Excellent
Data and/or graphics and/or visuals shown various formats and in an organised manner.
Overall aethetics
Substandard
Poster lacks aesthetic appeal in terms of design, layout and neatness.
Poor
Poster has some aesthetic appeal, but problems with layout/neatness means it is not always clear or easily understandable.
Fair
Poster layout is clear and understandable, but more attention could be paid to layout and/or neatness.
Good
Poster layout is clear and understandable but is excessively crowded in parts which detracts from interest.
Excellent
Poster is clear, understandable, succinct, and generates interest with aesthetically appealing design, layout and neatness.
References
Substandard
References are not provided
Poor
Only some references are provided or references are not fully cited
Fair
References are cited fully, but some are nonscientific sources or are out of date
Good
References are cited fully and most are reliable scientific sources
Excellent
All references are reliable, up-to-date scientific sources and cited fully
Subjects:
Science
(General)
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Science rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n232
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.