iRubric: Annotated Bibliography rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Annotated Bibliography Annotated Bibliography This rubic is used for grading the Annotated Bibliography project for Consider the Source. Rubric Code: YB9CW3 By nbiggs Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Social Sciences Type: Project Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Criteria 100 %
	Excellent 10 pts	Needs Development 5 pts	Unsatisfactory 0 pts
PBWorks Research Guide 0 % extra credit	Excellent demonstrated thoughtful exploration of other fields. Evidence of having used Dbs by Subject	Needs Development used recommended dbs only	Unsatisfactory didn't do
Research Log 25 % tried other dbs quality of keywords evidence of adjustments in process	Excellent evidence of thoughtful exploration and learning	Needs Development evidence of some exploration and learning	Unsatisfactory didn't do
Number of Sources 20 % 5-7 at least 1 book at least 1 ency article	Excellent The number of sources listed demonstrate an effort to become familiar with sources in the field and stretch out to include others. They include sources in at least 4 categories (books, articles, etc.)	Needs Development Includes sources in at least 4 categories, but shows a lack of thoroughness in exploring possible sources.	Unsatisfactory Includes fewer than 4 sources. Sources listed demonstrate a lack of effort in exploring possible sources.
Citations 5 % APA Refworks	Excellent APA good evidence of RW	Needs Development mostly correct might have used RW	Unsatisfactory not APA
Annotation 25 % Where did you find it? How did you find it? Info on author? Includes a bibl? pop or scholarly? book review avail? Did it help you focus your topic? Audience: expert or general scope broad or narrow? if older, why selected? cited?	Excellent Includes annotations for every sources. Notes demonstrate an understanding of why the source is important or might be useful.	Needs Development Annotations for some sources are missing. Notes are vague or display a lack of understanding of the relevance of the source.	Unsatisfactory No annotations,
Relevance of Sources 25 %	Excellent Sources are of primary importance to the topic or provide a relevant perspective from another discipline.	Needs Development Missing some key sources. Some sources listed are unlikely to result in information relevant to the topic	Unsatisfactory Sources listed are not likely to contain relevant information.