Skip to main content
iRubric: Writing Assignments for Event Management rubric

iRubric: Writing Assignments for Event Management rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Writing Assignments for Event Management 
Writing Assignments for Event Management
This rubric is to be used when assessing INDIVIDUAL assignments
Rubric Code: XXX748B
By cwittke
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Business  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Criterion
  Poor - 0 or 1

None/very little<BR>
Missing parts<BR>
Flawed rationale<BR>
Lacks logic

1 pts

Fair - 2 or 3

Some attempts show progress<BR>
Logical in some parts<BR>
Rationale is accurate in some parts

2 pts

Good - 3 or 4

Most or All/Follows what was taught in class<BR>
Very little original thinking but classroom learning is applied with accuracy

3 pts

Excellent - 5 +

All/Above and Beyond/Original thinking

4 pts

Content & Development - thoroughnes

This refers to the the thoroughness of included information in the assignment as required by the outline.<BR>
<BR>
/5
Poor - 0 or 1

- Content is incomplete.<BR>
- Major points are not clear and /or missing and/ or persuasive.
Fair - 2 or 3

- Content is not comprehensive and /or persuasive.<BR>
- Some Major points are addressed, but not well supported. <BR>
- Research is inadequate or does not address course concepts.<BR>
- Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.
Good - 3 or 4

Meets requirements for a report/assignment at a graduate level - error free, opening, evidence shared, conclusion.
Excellent - 5 +

- Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive.<BR>
- Major points are stated clearly and are well supported.<BR>
- Research is adequate, timely and addresses course concepts.<BR>
- Content and purpose of the writing are clear.
Required Responses - Depth

This refers to how comprehensive the student(s) responses are to all questions.<BR>
<BR>
/10
Poor - 0 or 1

Missing some answers to questions OR very little detail or original thinking shown.<BR>
Most information is flawed or incorrect.
Fair - 2 or 3

Some questions are answered - but there are many areas lacking any depth of detail or showing thinking - responses do not show any original thinking or ideas and student does not follow process/information taught in class.
Good - 3 or 4

Some questions are answered - but there are areas lacking any depth of thinking - responses may not show original thinking or ideas and student sometimes follows process/information taught in class.
Excellent - 5 +

All questions are answered - in depth and thoughtful/reflective<BR>
- appliation of learning from within the classroom is expanded and uses some original thinking
Accuracy of answers

This refers to the five main questions <BR>
<BR>
/10
Poor - 0 or 1

Assignment criteria is not mentioned or does not make sense based on the content of the outline and requirements of the assignment <BR>
Not done/included<BR>
Format difficult to uNot included or not a realistic choice understand
Fair - 2 or 3

Ideas may work but not best choice<BR>
Format included but is flawed<BR>
Some errors or flaws in recommendation<BR>
- seems to be generic/not customized to demographic and group
Good - 3 or 4

Meets what was expected/required for a student taking this course.
Excellent - 5 +

Application of program learning<BR>
Answers show creativity and customization - recognizes outline/scenario and expands on requirements
Organization & Structure

This refers to the overall paper and how it "flows"<BR>
<BR>
/5
Poor - 0 or 1

- Organization and structure detract from the message of the writer.<BR>
- Introduction and/or conclusion is missing.<BR>
- Paragraphs are disjointed and lack transition of thoughts.
Fair - 2 or 3

- Structure of the paper is not easy to follow. <BR>
- Introduction is missing or, if provided, does not preview major points.<BR>
- Paragraph transitions need improvement.<BR>
- Conclusion is missing, or if provided, does not flow from the body of the paper.
Good - 3 or 4

Meets what was expected/required for this level of program.
Excellent - 5 +

- Structure of the paper is clear and easy to follow (layout and design)<BR>
- Introduction provides clear background on the topic and previews major points.<BR>
- Paragraph transitions are present and logical and maintain the flow of thought throughout the paper.<BR>
- Conclusion is logical and flows from the body of the paper.
Format, grammar, punctuation

This refers to the overall professionalism and attention to details.<BR>
<BR>
/5
Poor - 0 or 1

- Paper lacks many elements of correct formattting.<BR>
- Citations and references are not provided.<BR>
- Paper is inadequate/excessive in length.<BR>
- Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.<BR>
- Language uses jargon or conversational tone.
Fair - 2 or 3

- Paper follows most guidelines.<BR>
- Paper provides citations, but they are incorrectly prepared.<BR>
- Paper provides reference list, with some errors or omissions.<BR>
- Paper is over/ under word length.<BR>
Paper contains few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors.<BR>
- Language lacks clarity or includes the use of some jargon or conversational tone.
Good - 3 or 4

- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.<BR>
- Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.<BR>
Some application of terminology
Excellent - 5 +

- Paper follows designated guidelines.<BR>
- Citations and references are used appropriately.<BR>
- Paper is the appropriate length as described for the assignment.<BR>
Correct appliation of industry terminology through-out paper.<BR>
Language is consistent and strong through the paper
Overall Impression

This refers to the over-all "first impression" of the professionalism and quality of the assignment submitted
/5
Poor - 0 or 1

Appears to be <BR>
a lack of attention to detail, time spent. care/quality
Fair - 2 or 3

Some errors but overall good effort shown - could be more polished and professional
Good - 3 or 4

Meets requirements for graduate level communication and writing (format, content, rationale, formality)
Excellent - 5 +

Attention to details shows and content reflects weight of assignment - care and quality are above average. Original thinking that is concise and clearly explained.



Keywords:
  • Risk Managment and application of learning to a scenario



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n232