Skip to main content

iRubric: Argument/Debate Group Project rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
This rubric is for evaluating argument essays/posters written and presented by students to assess their ability to formulate argumentative writings that support the guilt or innocence of the narrator in "The Raven" and "The Tell-Tale Heart" by Edgar Allen Poe. Group members are only assessed on their portion(s) of the project.
Rubric Code: XXB858B
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: (General)  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric Project Elements
  *

(N/A)

Points Earned

(N/A)

Opening/Claim/Introduction/Thesis
15 pts

Connect the crime and/or your position to something the reader/audience can relate to historically or socially; Briefly preview (don't list) the arguments you're going to make; State the thesis in a way that links to the arguments you previewed and should provide an answer to the prompt.

*

MEMBER RESPONSIBLE:
Points Earned
Reason/Idea/Evidence #1
15 pts

POINT (Idea from Insanity Definition),
EVIDENCE (What does the text say?),
EXPLANATION (what does the evidence mean?),
LINK (how/why does the evidence matter to your thesis statement of guilt or innocence?)

*

MEMBER RESPONSIBLE:
Points Earned
Reason/Idea/Evidence #2
15 pts

POINT (Idea from Insanity Definition),
EVIDENCE (What does the text say?),
EXPLANATION (what does the evidence mean?),
LINK (how/why does the evidence matter to your thesis statement of guilt or innocence?)

*

MEMBER RESPONSIBLE:
Points Earned
Reason/Idea/Evidence #3
15 pts

POINT (Idea from Insanity Definition),
EVIDENCE (What does the text say?),
EXPLANATION (what does the evidence mean?),
LINK (how/why does the evidence matter to your thesis statement of guilt or innocence?)

*

MEMBER RESPONSIBLE:
Points Earned
Counter/Opposing Claim w Evidence
15 pts

What others who disagree might say (Point)
what evidence they may cite (Evidence/Says), what they might say it means to the opposite view (Explanation/Means) and why it is wrong (Link/Matters).

*

MEMBER RESPONSIBLE:
Points Earned
Closing/Conclusion
15 pts

Restate the thesis, perhaps in a slightly different way than in the Intro.; Clearly but briefly repeat the separate arguments and how they were linked to your thesis; End the with a summarizing statement that leaves the reader/audience thinking about why your position is correct.

*

MEMBER RESPONSIBLE:
Points Earned
Poster Creativity
5 pts

ALL GROUP MEMBERS

*
Points Earned
Group Presentation
5 pts

ALL GROUP MEMBERS

*
Points Earned



Keywords:
  • argumentative writing


Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n178