Skip to main content

iRubric: Video Rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Video Rubric Video Rubric Rubric for evaluating created student videos. Adopted from KQED Education Network. http://www.kqed.org/quest/education Rubric Code: WXX768A By angiesoliver Draft Public Rubric Subject: (General) Type: Presentation Grade Levels: 9-12

Video Rubric
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Introduction Includes title, author, music/voice, images	Poor Introduction is not included	Fair Includes title but no author	Good Introduces the topic and author but is missing graphics or sound	Excellent Introduction includes, title and author and has images to match
Technical Production Transitions	Poor Much of the piece has distracting background noise. Transitions are jumpy.	Fair There is distracting dead space and/or ambient noise. Transitions are uneven.	Good Transitions are smooth, but dead space is occasionally heard.	Excellent Smooth transitions throughout piece. No dead space.
Technical Production Volume	Poor Volume changes are highly distracting.	Fair Volume is occasionally inconsistent.	Good Volume is acceptable.	Excellent Audio volume complements the presentation.
Technical Production Length	Poor Piece doesn't follow teacher guidelines for length of media.	Fair N/A	Good Piece is a bit too long or too short but close to the teacher guidlines for length of the media.	Excellent Presenter followed teacher guidelines for the length of the media.
Images/Graphics Helpfulness and relating	Poor The graphics don't relate to the audio and distract from the content.	Fair The graphics only marginally relate to the audio and aren't always helpful in communicating the content.	Good The graphics relate to the audio and are helpful in communicating the content.	Excellent The graphics and images contribute to a creative and effective presentation and enhance key points by contributing to the concept explanation.
Images/Graphics Quality	Poor Many shots are out of focus and many shots need additional cropping. Shaky or unsteady camera work is distracting.	Fair Most shots are in focus, but pictures need additional cropping. Some camera work is shaky or unsteady.	Good Most shots are in focus and nicely cropped. Most camera work is smooth and steady.	Excellent All shots are in focus and nicely cropped. The camera work is smooth and steady.
Images/Graphics Originality	Poor Copyright infringement is obvious.	Fair Use of copyrighted works is problematic.	Good All images and/or audio have either been created by the media producer or are copyright cleared. Appropriate evidence and documentation for copyright is missing.	Excellent All images and/or audio was either created by the producer or have appropriate evidence and documentation for copyright clearance.
Content Creativity and originality	Poor No creative elements are included, or the types of creative elements used are inappropriate or distract from the content and/or purpose of the piece.	Fair Creativity is lacking and doesn't enhance the content and/or purpose of the piece. Creative elements may distract from the content or purpose.	Good Creative elements are included, but don't enhance the purpose of the piece. Creative elements don't distract from the content or purpose.	Excellent Creativity and original content enhance the purpose of the piece in an innovative way.
Content View	Poor View is presented in a confusing manner AND there is little to no background of where it came from.	Fair View is presented in a basic manner that may lack depth OR there is little to no background of where it came from.	Good View is presented is acceptable though not detailed manner OR there is some background of where it came from.	Excellent View covers topic in-depth, sharing lear, meaningful ideas backed with pertinent specific details explaining view and background. Subject knowledge is excellent.
Content Biblical references	Poor Presentation lacked any Biblical references.	Fair Presentation included some Bible verses or references.	Good Presentation was mostly supported by Bible verses.	Excellent Presentation was fully supported by relevant Bible verses and passages.
Content Evaluation	Poor View is not evaluated as complementary, discardable or a replacement for substitutionary view of Atonement.	Fair View is mentioned as being complementary, discardable, or a replacement for substitutionary view for the atonment.	Good View is mentioned and somewhat described as being complementary, discardable, or a replacement for substitutionary view of the atonement.	Excellent View is clearly demonstrated as being complementary, discardable, or a replacement for substitutionary view of the atonement.

Keywords:

Video

Subjects:

(General)

Types:

Presentation

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More (General) rubrics

More Presentation rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n178