iRubric: LS 20 Wages Hours Discussion Forum Rubric Fall 2013

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
LS 20 Wages Hours Discussion Forum Rubric Fall 2013 LS 20 Title VII Discussion Forum Rubric Fall 2013 The forum should be student guided and professionally conducted with respectful attitudes, even through addressing differing opinions. This is a professional forum and should be treated as such. Rubric Code: WA6A74 By kenadile Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Law Type: (Other) Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Wages Hours Discussion Rubric
	Excellent 15 pts	Good 10 pts	Fair 5 pts	Unacceptable 0 pts
Initial Posting	Excellent Posts well developed assignment that fully addresses and develops all aspects of the task.	Good Posts well developed assignment that addresses all aspects of the task; lacks full development of concepts.	Fair Posts adequate assignment with superficial thought and preparation; doesn’t address all aspects of the task.	Unacceptable Posts no assignment.
Response Post Explores, explains, expands upon the issue being discussed. Uses text and experience to discuss subject matter. Demonstrates analysis on various levels other than the personal.	Excellent Demonstrates analysis of others’ posts; extends meaningful discussion by building on previous posts. Posts factually correct, reflective and substantive contribution; advances discussion.	Good Elaborates on an existing posting with further comment or observation. Posts information that is factually correct; lacks full development of concept or thought.	Fair Posts shallow contribution to discussion (e.g., agrees or disagrees); does not enrich discussion. Posts were simple and superficial. Repeats but does not add substantive information to the discussion.	Unacceptable Posts no follow-up responses to others. Or posts information that is off-topic, incorrect, or irrelevant to discussion.
References and Support Incorporates readings, research, and personal experiences	Excellent Uses references to readings, research, or personal experience to support comments.	Good Incorporates some references from readings, research, and personal experience.	Fair Uses personal experience, but no references to readings or research.	Unacceptable Includes no references or supporting experience. Or did not post.
Professionalism Respectful interactions.	Excellent Contributes valuable information to discussion. No unprofessional comments or behaviors	Good Contributes valuable information to discussion. No unprofessional comments or behaviors	Fair Communicates in friendly, courteous and helpful manner. No unprofessional comments or behaviors	Unacceptable Posts long, unorganized or rude content that may contain multiple errors or may be inappropriate. Unprofessional comment or behavior.