iRubric: Art Appreciation Research Paper rubric

- All art/info is fully identified in a natural and flowing manner.
- Images are provided where appropriate, cited in the text, and clearly labeled.
-Structure of the paper is clear and easy to follow.
- Paragraph transitions are logical and maintain the flow of thought throughout the paper.
- Conclusion brings the argument back to the claim in a meaningful way.

- Most art is identified well, style may be distracting.
- Images are provided for the primary subject, cited in the text, and clearly labeled.
- Structure is mostly clear and easy to follow.
- Paragraph transitions are present.
- Conclusion summarizes the claim.

- Art identification is an issue that detracts from the paper.
- Images provided are unlabeled or not mentioned in the text.
- Organization and structure detract from the message of the writer.
- Paragraphs are disjointed and lack transition of thoughts
- The paper does show some consideration for how it ends.

- Art is unidentified to the extent that the works being discussed becomes unclear.
- Images are not provided or are irrelevant.
- Organization and structure detract from the message of the writer.
- Paragraphs are arbitrary, and lack clear thought.
- No conclusion present.

- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.
- Writing style is professional and language is clear.

- Paper contains few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors.
- The writing style is mostly professional and Language is understandable.

- Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.
- The writing style is somewhat too casual or the language is confusing.

- Paper contains excessive grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.
- The writing style lacks refinement and the language is confusing.