Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Art Appreciation Research Paper rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Art Appreciation Research Paper
Art Appreciation Research Paper
Art Research Paper
Rubric Code:
W7495C
By
khuotari
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Arts and Design
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Criterion
Excellent
10 pts
Good
7 pts
Fair
5 pts
Poor
3 pts
Content
3 pts
Excellent
- Thesis statement is presented as an argument and accurately relates to the content of the paper.
- Ideas presented demonstrate strong engagement with the material.
- Provides abundant, accurate and convincing evidence in support of the thesis.
Good
- A Thesis is stated as an argument, but is somewhat unclear or unrepresentative of the overall content.
- Ideas presented demonstrate a familiarity with the material.
- Provides adequate evidence, but some of it is either incorrect or irrelevant.
Fair
- The paper show direction but lacks a clear thesis statement or is not argumentative.
- Ideas presented demonstrate a misunderstanding of the material.
- Provides limited evidence or contains multiple errors.
Poor
- No clear direction dictates the content of the paper.
- Ideas presented are unrelated to the material.
- Lacks accurate evidence or fails to connect evidence to claims.
Organization
2 pts
Excellent
- All art/info is fully identified in a natural and flowing manner.
- Images are provided where appropriate, cited in the text, and clearly labeled.
-Structure of the paper is clear and easy to follow.
- Paragraph transitions are logical and maintain the flow of thought throughout the paper.
- Conclusion brings the argument back to the claim in a meaningful way.
Good
- Most art is identified well, style may be distracting.
- Images are provided for the primary subject, cited in the text, and clearly labeled.
- Structure is mostly clear and easy to follow.
- Paragraph transitions are present.
- Conclusion summarizes the claim.
Fair
- Art identification is an issue that detracts from the paper.
- Images provided are unlabeled or not mentioned in the text.
- Organization and structure detract from the message of the writer.
- Paragraphs are disjointed and lack transition of thoughts
- The paper does show some consideration for how it ends.
Poor
- Art is unidentified to the extent that the works being discussed becomes unclear.
- Images are not provided or are irrelevant.
- Organization and structure detract from the message of the writer.
- Paragraphs are arbitrary, and lack clear thought.
- No conclusion present.
Research
2 pts
Excellent
- Major points are stated clearly and are well supported by referenced sources
- Utilizes two scholarly sources
Good
- Major points are stated and sometimes supported by referenced sources
- Includes one scholarly source or two non-scholarly sources
Fair
- Major points are addressed, but not well supported by referenced sources
- Only has non-scholarly sources cited
Poor
- Major points are not clear and /or unsupported.
- No sources cited
Grammar, Punctuation & Spelling
2 pts
Excellent
- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.
- Writing style is professional and language is clear.
Good
- Paper contains few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors.
- The writing style is mostly professional and Language is understandable.
Fair
- Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.
- The writing style is somewhat too casual or the language is confusing.
Poor
- Paper contains excessive grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.
- The writing style lacks refinement and the language is confusing.
Format and Length
1 pts
Excellent
- Paper follows Chicago format and uses footnotes.
- Paper fulfills length requirements
- Font and spacing fulfills requirements
Good
- Paper Mostly follows Chicago format and uses footnotes.
- Paper is at least a page under required length.
- Font or Spacing is moderately incorrect.
Fair
- Paper follows a citation style with multiple errors.
- Paper length is inadequate in a way that distracts from the assignment.
- Numerous formatting issues
Poor
- Citations are not used in a meaningful way.
- Paper Length highly effects the usefulness of the assignment.
- Excessive formatting issues
Subjects:
Accounting
Arts and Design
Biology
Business
Chemistry
Communication
Computers
Dance
Engineering
English
Finance
Foreign Languages
Geography
Geology
Health
History
Humanities
Journalism
Law
Math
Medical
Music
Philosophy
Physical Ed., Fitness
Physics
Political Science
Psychology
Science
Social Sciences
(General)
Types:
Exam
Homework
Project
Presentation
Assignment
Writing
(Other)
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Accounting rubrics
More Exam rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n60
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.