Skip to main content

iRubric: Team Anthology Annotated Bibliography Project rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Team Anthology Annotated Bibliography Project LBRA 1191 Annotated Bibliography Group Annotated Bibliography assignment as an introduction to the Research Project Rubric Code: W5B8CX By smcgriff Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Project Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Annotated Bibliography
	Excellent 5 pts	Good 4 pts	Fair 3 pts	Poor 2 pts
Number of Sources	Excellent 3	Good 2	Fair 1	Poor 0
Quality of Sources	Excellent Sources are interesting and appropriate. Each is clearly relevant to your topic.	Good Sources are interesting and most are appropriate.	Fair Some of the sources cover the topic, but they are uninspiring and their relevance to this topic is unclear.	Poor Few, if any, of the sources are relevant to the topic or<BR> you have not read closely enough to determine if your sources are related or not.
Quality of Annotations	Excellent Thorough annotations that show thoughtful analysis. All 9 annotations are at least three paragraphs long: <BR> a. Summarizing<BR> b. Evaluating & Relating to other annotations<BR> c. Relates source to Research project/question & how it fits into it.	Good Annotations show analysis. 5 or more annotations are at least three paragraphs long: a. Summarizing<BR> b. Evaluating & Relating to other annotations<BR> c. Relates source to Research project/question & how it fits into it.	Fair Annotations relate to topics. 3-4 annotations are at least three paragraphs long: a. Summarizing<BR> b. Evaluating & Relating to other annotations<BR> c. Relates source to Research project/question & how it fits into it.	Poor Annotations reveal little analysis. 1-2 annotations are at least three paragraphs long: a. Summarizing<BR> b. Evaluating & Relating to other annotations<BR> c. Relates source to Research project/question & how it fits into it.
MLA Citations	Excellent All formatted correctly using MLA format and in alphabetical order.	Good 1 or 2 errors using the MLA format.	Fair 3 or 4 errors using the MLA format.	Poor More than 4 errors using the MLA format.
Mechanics/Conventions	Excellent There are no grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. And there are no formatting errors.	Good There are 3 or 4 minor errors in punctuation, grammar and/or spelling which do not break the flow for the reader.	Fair There are 1 or 2 major errors in punctuation, grammar and/or spelling which do interrupt the flow for the reader.	Poor There are 3 or 4 major errors in punctuation, grammar and/or spelling which make it difficult to read.
Team Collaboration
	Excellent 5 pts	Good 4 pts	Fair 3 pts	Poor 2 pts
Discussion Board	Excellent Routinely provides useful ideas/replies on the discussion board & in the classroom/library discussion. A definite leader who contributes a lot of effort.	Good Usually provides useful ideas/replies on the discussion board & in the classroom/library discussion. A definite leader who contributes a lot of effort.	Fair Sometimes provides useful ideas/replies on the discussion board & in the classroom/library discussion. A definite leader who contributes a lot of effort.	Poor Rarely provides useful ideas/replies on the discussion board & in the classroom/library discussion. A definite leader who contributes a lot of effort.
Quality of Work	Excellent Provides work of the highest quality	Good Provides high quality work.	Fair Provides work that occasionally needs to be checked/redone by other group members to ensure quality	Poor Provides work that usually needs to be checked/redone by others to ensure quality
Time Management	Excellent Routinely uses time well throughout the project to ensure things get done on time. Group does not have to adjust deadlines or work responsibilities because of this person's procrastination.	Good Usually uses time well throughout the project but may have procrastinated on one thing, Group does not have to adjust deadlines or work responsibilities because of this person's procrastination.	Fair Tends to procrastinate, but always gets things done by the deadlines. Group does not have to adjust deadlines or work responsibilities because of this person's procrastination.	Poor Rarely gets things done by the deadlines AND group has to adjust deadlines or work responsibilities because of this person's inadequate time management.
Working with Others	Excellent Routinely monitors the effectiveness of the group, and makes suggestions to make it more effective.	Good Routinely monitors the effectiveness of the group, and works to make the group more effective.	Fair Occasionally monitors the effectiveness of the group, and makes suggestions to make the group more effective.	Poor Rarely monitors the effectiveness of the group, and does not work to make it more effective.
Monitors Group Effectiveness	Excellent Routinely monitors the effectiveness of the group, and makes suggestions to make it more effective.	Good Routinely monitors the effectiveness of the group, and works to make the group more effective.	Fair Occasionally monitors the effectiveness of the group, and makes suggestions to make the group more effective.	Poor Rarely monitors the effectiveness of the group, and does not work to make it more effective.

Keywords:

Team, Collaboration, Annotated Bibliography

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More English rubrics

More Project rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n202