- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Technology Grant Rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Technology Grant Rubric Technology Grant Rubric Use this rubric for grading Technology Grant assignment for ED 302: Instructional Resources and Media. Rubric Code: W59B8C By keloddo Draft Public Rubric Subject: Education Type: Assignment Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Criterion
	Poor 1 pts	Good 2 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Clarity of Vision pts	Poor The proposal doesn't present a realistic vision for the project.	Good The proposal somewhat presents a realistic vision for the project.	Excellent The proposal demonstrates a clear vision for the project.
Magnitude of Problem pts	Poor The proposal does not describe the magnitude of the problem.	Good Vaguely presents an argument about the magnitude of the problem.	Excellent Clearly describes the magnitude of the problem including a supporting argument.
Economic Need pts	Poor The proposal does not describe the economic need.	Good Vaguely mentions the economic need.	Excellent Clearly describes the economic need including facts and supporting data.
Community Collaboration pts	Poor The proposal does not describe community collaboration.	Good The proposal leaves the funders guessing and making assumptions about community collaboration.	Excellent Clearly describes the collaboration with the community.
Impact of Project pts	Poor The proposal does not address the impact of the project on the school or hospital.	Good The proposal leaves the funders guessing and making assumptions about the impact of the project.	Excellent Clearly describes the impact of the project on the children and staff in the school or hospital.
Clear Objectives pts	Poor The proposal does not present clear project objectives	Good Objectives could use a little more work.	Excellent Well written measurable objectives.
Budget pts	Poor The budget is missing or incomplete. It leaves the funders guessing.	Good The budget is well-reasoned but missing specific details on how the $5,000 will be used.	Excellent The budget is well-reasoned, stays within the allotted $5,000, and complete details.
Well Written pts	Poor -Does not convey well reasoned arguments. -Does not express important ideas. -Incomplete sentences.	Good -Some of the arguments are well reasoned, while others need some work. -Leaves the funders guessing. -Incomplete sentence structure	Excellent -Conveys well reasoned arguments. -Demonstrates ability to express important ideas. -Keeps the funders engaged. -Complete sentence structure.
On Time pts	Poor Not Submitted on Time	Good Submitted on Time	Excellent