iRubric: Code.org Video Game Design rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Code.org Video Game Design Code.org Video Game Design Rubric Code: VXCWXBX By alaineste Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: (General) Type: Project Grade Levels: 9-12

Enter rubric title
	Beginning 1 pts	Developing 2 pts	Proficient 3 pts	Exceptional 4 pts
Research	Beginning 1.Shows little to no understanding of game design.	Developing 1.Shows minimal understanding of Game Design May state a language used but not be able to explain its use or efficiency.	Proficient 1.Shows some knowledge and understanding of Game Design. Includes an explanation of coding skills required. May not explain why you chose the language you did and or why it is the most efficient choice.	Exceptional 1.Shows in-depth understanding of Game Design by including an explanation of the coding skills required. EX: Why the creator (YOU) chose the computer language you did? What makes it more efficient than others?
Project Requirements	Beginning 1. Did not incorporate relevant artwork 2. Game rules unclear and don't fit content well 3. 7 or less slides 4. less than 4 steps addressed	Developing 1. Project uses artwork of others with some effort to change 2. Game rules don't necessarily fit content well, instructions are not well-written and integrated into design 3. At least 8 slides 4. Addressed 4 of the steps to design	Proficient 1.Project uses original artwork or reuses imported images creatively 2. Game rules fits content well, instructions are well-written and integrated into design 3. At least 10 slides 4. Addressed 4-5 of the steps to design	Exceptional 1. Project artwork and creativity significantly support the content 2. At least 10 slides 3. Game rules fits content well, instructions are well-written and integrated into design 4. Addressed all 6 of the steps to design
Time Management	Beginning 1. Did not use project time well and did not meet deadlines 2. Did not collaborate	Developing 1. Used project time well sometimes and met some deadlines 2. Collaborated at times	Proficient 1. Used project time constructively, met deadlines 2. Collaborated appropriately	Exceptional 1. Used project time constructively or added additional elements 2. Found ways to collaborate and work beyond class time
Presentation (Marketing)	Beginning 1. Students did not deliver presentation	Developing 1. Presentation was not planned 2. Presentation did not explain the game well and or market the product efficiently	Proficient 1. Presentation demonstrated some planning 2. Presentation gave brief explanation of the game and marketed it somewhat well	Exceptional 1. Presentation was thorough, and well-planned 2. Presentation thoughtfully explained the game and marketed it efficiently 2. Creative format - (advertisement, trailer, etc.)