Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Coaching Psychology Chapter Review rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Coaching Psychology Chapter Review
General Psychology Paper
Write a 2-3 page review of each chapter (5 - 15) in Part II Coaching psychology: approaches in the Handbook of Coaching Psychology, A Guide for Practitioners textbook. Your final draft should be between 22 - 33 pages, typed, 1.5 space, including headings and sub-headings. See syllabus for fully instructions.
Rubric Code:
VX249AC
By
muechi
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Psychology
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Coaching Psychology Approaches
Excellent
20 pts
Good
15 pts
Fair
10 pts
Poor
5 pts
Theories and Concepts
Excellent
All (11/11) major theories and theorists are presented.
- Theories and theorists presented and extensively discussed.
- Content is comprehensive and accurate.
- Ideas are presented in a clear and understandable manner.
- Major points are stated clearly and are well supported.
- Concepts and purpose of the writing are clear.
- Research is adequate, timely and addresses primary concepts.
- There are ample examples to back up the concepts from chapters
Good
Most (10/11) major theories and theorists are presented.
- Theories and theorists are presented and adequately discussed.
- Content is comprehensive.
- Major points are addressed and moderately supported.
- Research does address primary concepts.
- Concepts are clearly stated and accurate.
-There are some examples relevant from each chapter.
Fair
- A few (8/11) theories are presented.
- Theories and theorists are presented, but minimally discussed.
- Basic concepts are included, however lacks breadth and depth.
- Content is lacks direction and focus.
- Major points are addressed, but unsupported.
Poor
- Content is incomplete; there is minimal information on chapter's concepts.
- Major points are unclear.
Relationship to Experiences
Excellent
- Detailed descriptions of the experiences are clearly explained with ample examples.
- Background information is supplied to illustrate the logic of the application.
Good
- The student's experiences are stated and backed up by some examples.
- Little background information is described.
Fair
- Some relationship to the student's experiences with the concepts, with few examples.
- Ideas are present, but not well supported by symptoms or evidence.
Poor
- Very few or no experience is identified.
- The student does not display an understanding of how the concepts are applied.
Format
Excellent
- Paper meets or exceeds the length requirement.
- Paper is in APA format, following all guidelines for structure, format, font, margins, and spacing.
-Format and flow between paragraphs enhances readability of paper.
Good
- Paper follows designated guidelines.
- Paper is appropriate length.
- APA format is good, with few errors.
- Format and flow are good and deliberate.
Fair
- Paper is about 2-3 pages.
- APA format has flaws, however, the general idea of how to format a paper in this structure comes across.
- Format and flow neither add to nor subtract from the readability of the paper.
Poor
- Paper lacks many elements of correct formatting.
- 2-3 page requirement is inadequate.
- Paper is not in APA format.
- Format and/or flow make it difficult to follow the writing.
Grammar, Punctuation, & Spelling
Excellent
- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.
- Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.
- Professional language is used throughout the paper
Good
- Rules of grammar, and punctuation are followed with minor errors. Spelling is correct.
- Language is mostly professional.
- Overall, the paper is comprehensive and easy to read.
Fair
- There are some errors throughout the paper in punctuation, spelling, and/or language.
- Language is somewhat professional; some conversational tone
Poor
- Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.
- Language uses jargon, slang or conversational tone.
Subjects:
Accounting
Arts and Design
Biology
Business
Chemistry
Communication
Computers
Dance
Engineering
English
Finance
Foreign Languages
Geography
Geology
Health
History
Humanities
Journalism
Law
Math
Medical
Music
Philosophy
Physical Ed., Fitness
Physics
Political Science
Psychology
Science
Social Sciences
(General)
Types:
Exam
Homework
Project
Presentation
Assignment
Writing
(Other)
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Accounting rubrics
More Exam rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n60
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.