Skip to main content
iRubric: Art History in the World - Rubric

iRubric: Art History in the World - Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Art History in the World - Rubric 
Art History Research Paper Rubric
Research Paper Rubric for GARTH 206
Rubric Code: V896X2
By purvislr
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Arts and Design  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Criterion
  Excellent

10 pts

Very Good

8 pts

Average

7 pts

Undeveloped

6 pts

Unacceptable

5 pts

Summary
10 %

Excellent

- Student demonstrates an outstanding ability to use research and identify scholarly sources
- argument is coherent and well supported by referenced sources
Very Good

- Student demonstrates an adequate ability to use research and identify scholarly sources
- argument is coherent and supported by referenced sources
Average

- Student demonstrates a limited ability to use research and identify scholarly sources
- argument is vague but supported by referenced sources
Undeveloped

- Student demonstrates little or no ability to use research and argues with little understanding of their research topic
Unacceptable

- Student either did not submit the assignment or was unable to demonstrate enough knowledge to receive credit for the discussion.
Content
10 %

Excellent

- Author connects the topic to Art History through complex analysis
- Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive.
Very Good

- Author connects the topic to Art History
- Content is accurate and persuasive.
Average

- Author connects the topic to Art History, but lacks clarity
- Content is not comprehensive and /or persuasive.
Undeveloped

- Author does not directly connect topic to Art History
- Content is incomplete.
- Questions were not adequately answered.
Unacceptable

- Student did not follow assignment guidelines
Thesis
10 %

Excellent

- Clearly stated thesis
and analysis
Very Good

- Clearly stated thesis and analysis, occasional missing connection
Average

- Thesis and analysis are included, some connections missing
Undeveloped

- Thesis lacks clarity or logic
Unacceptable

- Thesis missing
Development
10 %

Excellent

- Interpretation is logical
- Thoughtful development of the topic
Very Good

- Topic is fully developed, but some points need more detail
or are over-emphasized
Average

- Interpretation is vague
- Topic lacks clear development
Undeveloped

- Interpretation is vague or difficult to understand
- Topic has not been developed and lacks clarity
Unacceptable

- Interpretation does not address assignment requirements
- Topic does not address requirements
Sources
10 %

NOTE:

You will receive a failing grade for the paper if you do not cite your work.
Excellent

- Includes three scholarly sources (textbook does not count towards this requirement)
Very Good

- Includes three sources, one is not scholarly (textbook does not count towards this requirement)
Average

- Includes three sources, two are not scholarly (textbook does not count towards this requirement)
Undeveloped

- Includes two scholarly or three non-scholarly sources (textbook does not count)
Unacceptable

- Sources insufficient or missing
Organization
10 %

Excellent

-Structure of the paper is clear and easy to follow.
- Paragraph transitions and conclusion are logical
- Conclusion flows from the body of the paper.
Very Good

- Structure is mostly clear and easy to follow.
- Paragraph transitions are present.
- Conclusion is logical.
Average

- Structure of the paper is not easy to follow.
- Paragraph transitions need improvement.
- Conclusion is missing, or if provided, does not flow from the body of the paper.
Undeveloped

- Organization and structure detract from the message of the writer.
- Paragraphs are disjointed and lack transition of thoughts.
- Conclusion is missing.
Unacceptable

- Unacceptable
- Student either did not submit the assignment or was unable to demonstrate enough knowledge to receive credit for the assignment.
Footnotes
10 %

Excellent

- Paper follows Chicago format and uses footnotes.
Very Good

- Paper follows Chicago format and uses footnotes. Occasional page number or url missing
Average

- Paper follows a citation style, some errors or notes are not in footnote form.
Undeveloped

- Paper does not follow any citation style, citations are not in footnote form.
- Footnotes include only definitions or additional text and lack source information
Unacceptable

- Unacceptable
- Paper does not follow a citation style.
Bibliography & Length
10 %

Excellent

-Bibliography included
- Paper fulfills length requirements
-Format enhances readability of paper.
- Font and spacing correct
Very Good

-Bibliography
- Paper fulfills length requirements
- Occasional formatting error (margins)
Average

-Bibliography
- Paper is over or under word length.
-Text is not formatted correctly
Undeveloped

-Bibliography included but incomplete
- Paper is inadequate or excessive in length.
-Paper is not double spaced
Unacceptable

- Unacceptable
-Bibliography missing
- Student did not follow assignment guidelines
Grammar, Punctuation & Spelling
10 %

Excellent

- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.
- Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.
Very Good

- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.
- Language is clear; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.
Average

- Paper contains few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors.
- Language lacks clarity or includes the use of some jargon or conversational tone.
Undeveloped

- Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.
- Language uses jargon or conversational tone.
Unacceptable

- Unacceptable
- Student either did not submit the assignment or was unable to demonstrate enough knowledge to receive credit for the assignment.
Paper #1
10 %

Excellent

Submitted
Very Good
Average
Undeveloped
Unacceptable

Not Submitted






Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n60