Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Inquiry and Analysis VALUE Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Inquiry and Analysis VALUE Rubric
Inquiry and Analysis VALUE Rubric
Inquiry is the ability to know when there is a need for information, to be able to identify, locate, evaluate, and effectively and responsibly use and share that information for the problem at hand. – The National Forum on Information Literacy. This rubric addresses the products of analysis and inquiry, not the processes themselves. The complexity of inquiry and analysis tasks is determined in part by how much information or guidance is provided to a student and how much the student constructs. The more the student constructs, the more complex the inquiry process. For this reason, while the rubric can be used if the assignments or purposes for work are unknown, it will work most effectively when those are known. Finally, faculty are encouraged to adapt the essence and language of each rubric criterion to the disciplinary or interdisciplinary context to which it is applied. Courtesy of AAC&U: http://aacu.org/value/index.cfm
Rubric Code:
V54XW8
By
mengman
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
(General)
Type:
(Other)
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate, Graduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Inquiry and Analysis VALUE Rubric
Capstone
4 pts
Milestone
3 pts
Milestone
2 pts
Benchmark
1 pts
Topic selection
Capstone
Identifies a creative, focused, and manageable topic that addresses potentially significant yet previously less-explored aspects of the topic.
Milestone
Identifies a focused and manageable/doable topic that appropriately addresses relevant aspects of the topic.
Milestone
Identifies a topic that while manageable/doable, is too narrowly focused and leaves out relevant aspects of the topic.
Benchmark
Identifies a topic that is far too general and wide-ranging as to be manageable and doable.
Existing Information
Existing Knowledge, Research, and/or Views
Capstone
Synthesizes in-depth information from relevant sources representing various points of view/approaches.
Milestone
Presents in-depth information from relevant sources representing various points of view/approaches.
Milestone
Presents information from relevant sources representing limited points of view/approaches.
Benchmark
Presents information from irrelevant sources representing limited points of view/approaches.
Design Process
Capstone
All elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are skillfully developed. Appropriate methodology or theoretical frameworks may be synthesized from across disciplines or from relevant subdisciplines.
Milestone
Critical elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are appropriately developed, however, more subtle elements are ignored or unaccounted for.
Milestone
Critical elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are missing, incorrectly developed, or unfocused.
Benchmark
Inquiry design demonstrates a misunderstanding of the methodology or theoretical framework.
Analysis
Capstone
Organizes and synthesizes evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
Milestone
Organizes evidence to reveal important patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
Milestone
Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing important patterns, differences, or similarities.
Benchmark
Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.
Conclusions
Capstone
States a conclusion that is a logical extrapolation from the inquiry findings.
Milestone
States a conclusion focused solely on the inquiry findings. The conclusion arises specifically from and responds specifically to the inquiry findings.
Milestone
States a general conclusion that, because it is so general, also applies beyond the scope of the inquiry findings.
Benchmark
States an ambiguous, illogical, or unsupportable conclusion from inquiry findings.
Limitations and Implications
Capstone
Insightfully discusses in detail relevant and supported limitations and implications.
Milestone
Discusses relevant and supported limitations and implications.
Milestone
Presents relevant and supported limitations and implications.
Benchmark
Presents limitations and implications, but they are possibly irrelevant and unsupported.
Keywords:
Inquiry, Analysis, Conclusions, Limitations, Implications
Subjects:
(General)
Types:
(Other)
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More (General) rubrics
More (Other) rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n202
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.