- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Writing Assessment NSCI Graduate Program rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Writing Assessment NSCI Graduate Program Writing Assessment NSCI Graduate Program This rubric is for grading student's written assignments. Rubric Code: V35532 By bjsmith Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Science Type: Writing Grade Levels: (none)

Criterion
	Substandard 1 pts	Poor 2 pts	Fair 3 pts	Good 4 pts	Exceptional 5 pts
Content & Discussion 60 pts	Substandard - Content is incomplete. - Major required topics are lacking or not all included or poorly discussed.	Poor - Major points are addressed, but not well supported or discussed.	Fair - Content is accurate - Content is mostly complete	Good - Major points are stated clearly and are well supported.	Exceptional - Major ponts are very well supported. - Purpose of the writing is clear.
Organization & Structure 10 pts	Substandard - Structure detracts from the message of the writer. - Introduction and/or conclusion is missing. - Paragraphs are disjointed and lack transition of thoughts.	Poor - Structure of the paper is not easy to follow. - Introduction does not preview all major points. - Paragraph transitions need improvement. - Conclusions are not clear.	Fair - Structure of the paper is clear. - Conclusions are not supported by the body of the paper.	Good - Introduction previews major points. - Paragraph transitions are logical. - Conclusions are supported in part by the body of the paper.	Exceptional - Conclusions are supported by the body of the paper.
Grammar, Punctuation & Spelling 10 pts	Substandard - Paper contains grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors throughout.	Poor - Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.	Fair - Paper contains few grammatical, and a few punctuation and spelling errors.	Good Paper contains 1-2 grammatical, and a few punctuation and spelling errors.	Exceptional - Paper contains no obvious errors in grammar, punctuation or spelling.
Intergration 20 pts	Substandard Offered no analysis.	Poor Offered very little analysis.	Fair No independent analysis.	Good Analysis was adequate but not thought provoking.	Exceptional Provided exceptional and thought provoking analysis.