Skip to main content

- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Superintendency Scoring Guide: Name of Candidate rubric

iRubric: Superintendency Scoring Guide: Name of Candidate rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Superintendency Scoring Guide: Name of Candidate Superintendency Scoring Guide: Name of Candidate Central Administration Interviews June 2024 Rubric Code: V2492CX By coleensmith Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Education Type: Presentation Grade Levels: K-5, 6-8, 9-12

Applicant: __________
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Superior 4 pts	Personal Notes Comments or notes (N/A)
Educational Philosophy	Poor Appears unsure of philosophy or what leadership entails; has no grasp on his leadership style; has little to no knowledge of components collaborative and inclusionary processes to get staff buy-in.	Fair Referenced philosophy but communicates vague understanding of leadership and some knowledge of collaborative, distributive leadership to secure buy in from staff.	Good Provided overview of philosophy and communicates satisfactorily leadership style and has average handle on how to empower staff and create the conditions for staff buy-in through distributive leadership when appropriate.	Superior Clear philosophy and communicates with depth and ease his leadership style and possesses appears to possess through examples the leadership skills and examples of empowerment of staff; understands how to ensure buy-in & from staff through collaborative, distributive leadership when appropriate	Personal Notes
Curriculum/Instruction	Poor No understanding of the standards; how to operate a standards based classroom or best practices for instruction. Needs extensive professional development.	Fair Has little understanding of the standards; how to operate a standards based classroom or best practices for instruction.Needs extensive professional development.	Good Has an adequate understanding of the standards, operating a standards based classroom and best practices for instruction. Demonstrates understanding of how to provide and organize PD for wide range of grade levels and content areas.	Superior Demonstrates exceptional understanding of the standards; how to operate a standards based classroom or best practices for instruction. Has expertise to teach others and how to provide and organize PD for wide range of grade levels and content areas.	Personal Notes
Understanding Assessment	Poor Has no knowledege of formative, summative assessement or standardized testing. Has no knowledge of how to use assessment data to inform curriculum and instruction.	Fair Has little knowledege of formative, summative assessement or standardized testing. Has little knowlege of how to use assessment data to inform curriculum and instruction.	Good Has little knowledege of formative, summative assessement or standardized testing. Has some knowledge of how to use assessment data to inform curriculum and instruction.	Superior Has a deep knowledege of formative, summative assessement or standardized testing. Has extensive knowledge of how to use assessment data to inform curriculum and instruction.	Personal Notes
Communication on District Initiatives	Poor Has no experience with public relations or marketing. Cannot articulate any ideas as to how PR relates to the success of a school.	Fair Has very little experience with public relations. Cannot articulate any ideas as to how PR and communication relates to the success of a school.	Good Has sufficient experience with public relations. Can articulate ideas as to how PR and communication relates to the success of a school district	Superior Has extensive experience with public. Can articulate many ideas as to how PR and communication is pivotal to the success of a school district and provided multiple examples	Personal Notes
Communication on Policy	Poor Has no experience with managing communication challenges and effectively achieving desired outcomes.	Fair Has little experience with managing communication challenges and effectively achieving desired outcomes.	Good Has sufficient experience and was able to clearly communicate example where they managed communication challenges and effectively achieved desired outcomes.	Superior Has extensive experience and clearly articulated examples where they managed communication challenges and achieved desired outcome with stakeholders	Personal Notes
Management	Poor Cannot articulate the managerial role of the administration as it applies to the daily operation of the school and the various functions associated with it. Answers awkardly.	Fair Poor articulation of the managerial role of the administration as it applies to the daily operation of the school and the various functions associated with it. Seems to be uncomfortable and vague.	Good Satisfactory articulation of the managerial role of the administration as it applies to the daily operation of the school and the various functions associated with it. Answers are well developed and reflect concrete understanding.	Superior Superior articulation of the managerial role of the administration as it applies to the daily operation of the school and the various functions associated with it. Answers are fully developed and reflect expensive knowledging of daily managment.	Personal Notes
Fiscal Management (questions 6&7)	Poor Has no experience in fiscal management or has a dismal track record when it comes to fiscal matters. Is not able to give any examples or elaborate about the budgeting process.	Fair Has little experience in fiscal management or has poor track record when it comes to fiscal matters. Limited experience with title grants. Examples are inappropriate and there is very little elaboration about the budgeting process.	Good Has satisfactory experience in fiscal management or has a adequate track record when it comes to fiscal matters. Knowledge of and collaboration on title grants from RIDE. Examples are appropriate and there is some elaboration about the budgeting process.	Superior Has extensive experience in fiscal management or has a superior track record when it comes to fiscal matters. Experience with grant writing and expectations from RIDE for title grants. Examples are appropriate and there is considerable elaboration about the budgeting process.	Personal Notes
Strategic Planning	Poor Has never been involved with a strategic planning process and cannot articulate the processes involved. No awareness of the EGSD priorities and plan	Fair Has had limited involvement with a strategic planning process and articulation of the processes involved is inadequate. Has never led a strategic planning process and did not reference any elements of the EGSD plan.	Good Has had limited involvement with a strategic planning process and cannot articulate the processes involved. Has never led a strategic planning process. Demonstrated knowledge of the EGSD plan.	Superior Has extensive involvement with a strategic planning process and articulate the processes and steps involved. Has led at least one strategic planning process. Demonstrated understanding of priorities of EGSD plan.	Personal Notes
Law, Rules, Regs	Poor Has no understanding of laws, rules & regulations required to do the work and would require extensive outside support and training.	Fair Has little understanding of the laws, rules and regulations that are required to act as assistant superintendent.Has little understanding of the laws, rules and regulations that are required to do the work & would have to have outside support & training.	Good Has general understanding of the laws, rules and regulations that are required to act as assistant superintendent & would need little outside support & training.	Superior Has deep understanding of the laws, rules and regulations that are required to act as assistant superintendent and can teach others.	Personal Notes
Professional Development	Poor Has no understanding of how to organize and plan for curriculum selection, rollout and assessment. Training for staff not mentioned as part of the process.	Fair Shared little understanding of how to organize and plan for curriculum selection, rollout and assessment. Training for staff mentioned as part of the process but no clear description of how they would implement plan	Good Has general understanding of how to organize and plan for curriculum selection, rollout and assessment. Able to describe overview for staff training iwth timeline	Superior Has experience and able to clearly articulate how to select, roll out and assess curriculum with staff training and awareness of timelines.	Personal Notes
Trauma Informed Practices and Training	Poor Has no experience or experiences with trauma informed practices with administration or faculty to disseminate the research and best practices	Fair Has little understanding or experience with trauma informed practices. Little experience with disseminating the research, best practices or training with administration or faculty	Good Has some experience with trauma informed practices. Able to speak to the research and best practices and ideas for how to offer training with administrators and faculty.	Superior Has experience with trauma informed practices. Able to articulate how to disseminate the research and best practices for training with administrators and faculty.	Personal Notes

Keywords:

Assistant Superintendent Interviews

Subjects:

Types:

Presentation

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Education rubrics

More Presentation rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.

n232