Skip to main content
iRubric: Instructor Evaluation rubric

iRubric: Instructor Evaluation rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Instructor Evaluation 
Instructor Evaluation
Co-teach Evaluation Rubric
Rubric Code: UX7754B
By mzbrit
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: (General)  
Type: (Other)  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Instructor Evaluation
  Unacceptable

1 pts

Needs Improvement

2 pts

Skilled

3 pts

Mastery

4 pts

Management: Instructional Materials

Unacceptable

(ISC)2 Materials are handled inefficiently, resulting in loss of instructional time. Learners are confused about how to use materials and feel frustrated during activities due to not understanding instructions.
Needs Improvement

Routines for handling
(ISC)2 materials and supplies function moderately well,
resulting in some loss of instructional time. Learners are somewhat oriented to materials and have some confusion about activity instructions.
Skilled

Routines for handling
(ISC)2 materials occur
smoothly without loss of
instructional time. Learners
are oriented to materials and are clear about activity
instructions.
Mastery

Routines for handling (ISC)2 materials
and supplies are seamless with
participants assuming some responsibility for efficient operation. Activity instructions are
provided in multiple modalities. Learners are oriented to materials
and are clear about activity instructions.
Delivery of Content

Unacceptable

Instructor makes content
errors or doesn't correct
content errors participants
make. Instructor
doesn't cover most of domain content within the (ISC)2 curriculum.
Needs Improvement

Instructor displays basic
content knowledge but
cannot articulate connections
with content and relevant field experience.
Instructor doesn't cover
domain content within the (ISC)2 curriculum.
Skilled

Instructor displays solid
content knowledge and
makes connections between the content and relevant field experience at appropriate participant level.
All domains covered
adequately using (ISC)2
curriculum.
Mastery

Instructor displays extensive content knowledge with evidence
of continuing pursuit of
knowledge. Instructor covers all domains accurately using (ISC)2 curriculum.
Activities and Assignments

Unacceptable

Activities and assignments
are were not connected to course objectives. Participants are
not engaged mentally and/or unable to complete the activities provided by the instructor.
Needs Improvement

The instructor presented some activities and
assignments related to
instructional objectives, but participants are not engaged with the activities.
Skilled

All activities and assignments that instructor presented meet instructional objectives. Almost all participants were engaged and could easily complete the activities.
Mastery

All participants are engaged in the activities and assignments. The instructor was able to adapt activities and
projects to enhance understanding of content.
Clarity of Objectives

Unacceptable

Objectives are not clearly communicated and represent low expectations and no conceptual understanding for participants.
Needs Improvement

Objectives are moderately
communicated in either the expectations or conceptual
understanding for
participants.
Skilled

Objectives are clearly communicated in their
expectations, conceptual
understanding and
importance of learning.
Mastery

Not only are the objectives clearly communicated but instructor can also clearly articulate how objectives relate to relevant practice.
Interaction with Participants

Unacceptable

Instructor interaction with at least some participants is negative, demeaning, sarcastic or inappropriate to demographic/culture of the participant. Participants exhibit visible frustration
with instructor.
Needs Improvement

Instructor-participant
interactions are generally
appropriate but reflect
occasional inconsistencies,
favoritism or disregard for
participant cultures.
Participants exhibit some
frustration with instructor.
Skilled

Instructor-participant
interactions are friendly and demonstrate general warmth, caring and respect. Such interactions are appropriate
to demographic and cultural norms. Participants exhibit
comfort/trust with instructor.
Mastery

Instructor demonstrates genuine caring and respect for individual
participants. Participants exhibit genuine caring and respect for instructor as an individual. Interactions are appropriate to the
demographics and cultural norms of the learners.
Discussion Techniques

Unacceptable

Interaction between
instructor and participant is predominately recitation style with instructor mediating questions/answers.
Needs Improvement

Instructor makes some
attempt to engage
participants in a true
discussion, with uneven
results. Participants are disconnected from discussion.
Skilled

Classroom interaction
represents true discussion,
with instructor stepping to
the side when appropriate.
Involves all participants.
Mastery

Instructor empowers participants to assume considerable
responsibility for the success of the discussion initiating topics, making unsolicited contributions.
Management of Transitions

Unacceptable

Much time is lost during
transitions. Instructor doesn't manage time well.
Needs Improvement

Transitions are sporadically
efficient resulting in some
loss of instructional time.
Skilled

Transitions occur smoothly
with little loss of instructional
time.
Mastery

Transitions are seamless with participants assuming
responsibility for productivity.
Checking for Understanding

Unacceptable

Checking for understanding
and feedback is either not
provided or is not specific to the domain or participant.
Needs Improvement

Checking for understanding and feedback is inconsistent
in quality and is somewhat
specific to the domain or
participant.
Skilled

Checking for understanding
and feedback is consistently
non-judgmental,
individualized and specific to the participant.
Mastery

Instructor checks for understanding
and feedback consistently and
adjusts content and delivery based
on feedback from participants.
Provision is made for participants to self assess and use feedback in their own learning.
Instructor Tone and Language

Unacceptable

Instructor’s spoken language is inaudible and contains many grammar and syntax
errors. Written language is illegible and contains many grammar and syntax errors.
Vocabulary is inappropriate or used incorrectly.
Needs Improvement

Instructor’s spoken language is audible, used appropriately, but isn't
appropriate to participant's background or knowledge.
Written language is legible and used appropriately.
Skilled

Instructor’s spoken language is audible, used appropriately, and is appropriate to participant's
knowledge and background.
Written language is legible, used appropriately.
Mastery

Instructor’s spoken and written language is audible/legible, used
appropriately, is appropriate to
participants knowledge and background and displays well chosen
vocabulary that enriches
the lesson.
Knowledge of Content Domains

Unacceptable

Instructor displays little
knowledge of (ISC)2 curriculum, resources and materials. Demonstrates weakness in All domains.
Needs Improvement

Instructor displays moderate
knowledge of (ISC)2 curriculum, resources and materials. Demonstrates fair knowledge in some domains.
Skilled

Instructor displays clear knowledge of
(ISC)2 curriculum resources, materials and clear knowledge of all domains.
Mastery

Instructor displays strong knowledge of
(ISC)2 curriculum resources, materials and in all domains and utilized presentations to significantly enhance
the curriculum.



Keywords:
  • Instructor Evaluation Scoring Rubric

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n232