Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Instructor Evaluation rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Instructor Evaluation
Instructor Evaluation
Co-teach Evaluation Rubric
Rubric Code:
UX7754B
By
mzbrit
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
(General)
Type:
(Other)
Grade Levels:
(none)
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Instructor Evaluation
Unacceptable
1 pts
Needs Improvement
2 pts
Skilled
3 pts
Mastery
4 pts
Management: Instructional Materials
Unacceptable
(ISC)2 Materials are handled inefficiently, resulting in loss of instructional time. Learners are confused about how to use materials and feel frustrated during activities due to not understanding instructions.
Needs Improvement
Routines for handling
(ISC)2 materials and supplies function moderately well,
resulting in some loss of instructional time. Learners are somewhat oriented to materials and have some confusion about activity instructions.
Skilled
Routines for handling
(ISC)2 materials occur
smoothly without loss of
instructional time. Learners
are oriented to materials and are clear about activity
instructions.
Mastery
Routines for handling (ISC)2 materials
and supplies are seamless with
participants assuming some responsibility for efficient operation. Activity instructions are
provided in multiple modalities. Learners are oriented to materials
and are clear about activity instructions.
Delivery of Content
Unacceptable
Instructor makes content
errors or doesn't correct
content errors participants
make. Instructor
doesn't cover most of domain content within the (ISC)2 curriculum.
Needs Improvement
Instructor displays basic
content knowledge but
cannot articulate connections
with content and relevant field experience.
Instructor doesn't cover
domain content within the (ISC)2 curriculum.
Skilled
Instructor displays solid
content knowledge and
makes connections between the content and relevant field experience at appropriate participant level.
All domains covered
adequately using (ISC)2
curriculum.
Mastery
Instructor displays extensive content knowledge with evidence
of continuing pursuit of
knowledge. Instructor covers all domains accurately using (ISC)2 curriculum.
Activities and Assignments
Unacceptable
Activities and assignments
are were not connected to course objectives. Participants are
not engaged mentally and/or unable to complete the activities provided by the instructor.
Needs Improvement
The instructor presented some activities and
assignments related to
instructional objectives, but participants are not engaged with the activities.
Skilled
All activities and assignments that instructor presented meet instructional objectives. Almost all participants were engaged and could easily complete the activities.
Mastery
All participants are engaged in the activities and assignments. The instructor was able to adapt activities and
projects to enhance understanding of content.
Clarity of Objectives
Unacceptable
Objectives are not clearly communicated and represent low expectations and no conceptual understanding for participants.
Needs Improvement
Objectives are moderately
communicated in either the expectations or conceptual
understanding for
participants.
Skilled
Objectives are clearly communicated in their
expectations, conceptual
understanding and
importance of learning.
Mastery
Not only are the objectives clearly communicated but instructor can also clearly articulate how objectives relate to relevant practice.
Interaction with Participants
Unacceptable
Instructor interaction with at least some participants is negative, demeaning, sarcastic or inappropriate to demographic/culture of the participant. Participants exhibit visible frustration
with instructor.
Needs Improvement
Instructor-participant
interactions are generally
appropriate but reflect
occasional inconsistencies,
favoritism or disregard for
participant cultures.
Participants exhibit some
frustration with instructor.
Skilled
Instructor-participant
interactions are friendly and demonstrate general warmth, caring and respect. Such interactions are appropriate
to demographic and cultural norms. Participants exhibit
comfort/trust with instructor.
Mastery
Instructor demonstrates genuine caring and respect for individual
participants. Participants exhibit genuine caring and respect for instructor as an individual. Interactions are appropriate to the
demographics and cultural norms of the learners.
Discussion Techniques
Unacceptable
Interaction between
instructor and participant is predominately recitation style with instructor mediating questions/answers.
Needs Improvement
Instructor makes some
attempt to engage
participants in a true
discussion, with uneven
results. Participants are disconnected from discussion.
Skilled
Classroom interaction
represents true discussion,
with instructor stepping to
the side when appropriate.
Involves all participants.
Mastery
Instructor empowers participants to assume considerable
responsibility for the success of the discussion initiating topics, making unsolicited contributions.
Management of Transitions
Unacceptable
Much time is lost during
transitions. Instructor doesn't manage time well.
Needs Improvement
Transitions are sporadically
efficient resulting in some
loss of instructional time.
Skilled
Transitions occur smoothly
with little loss of instructional
time.
Mastery
Transitions are seamless with participants assuming
responsibility for productivity.
Checking for Understanding
Unacceptable
Checking for understanding
and feedback is either not
provided or is not specific to the domain or participant.
Needs Improvement
Checking for understanding and feedback is inconsistent
in quality and is somewhat
specific to the domain or
participant.
Skilled
Checking for understanding
and feedback is consistently
non-judgmental,
individualized and specific to the participant.
Mastery
Instructor checks for understanding
and feedback consistently and
adjusts content and delivery based
on feedback from participants.
Provision is made for participants to self assess and use feedback in their own learning.
Instructor Tone and Language
Unacceptable
Instructor’s spoken language is inaudible and contains many grammar and syntax
errors. Written language is illegible and contains many grammar and syntax errors.
Vocabulary is inappropriate or used incorrectly.
Needs Improvement
Instructor’s spoken language is audible, used appropriately, but isn't
appropriate to participant's background or knowledge.
Written language is legible and used appropriately.
Skilled
Instructor’s spoken language is audible, used appropriately, and is appropriate to participant's
knowledge and background.
Written language is legible, used appropriately.
Mastery
Instructor’s spoken and written language is audible/legible, used
appropriately, is appropriate to
participants knowledge and background and displays well chosen
vocabulary that enriches
the lesson.
Knowledge of Content Domains
Unacceptable
Instructor displays little
knowledge of (ISC)2 curriculum, resources and materials. Demonstrates weakness in All domains.
Needs Improvement
Instructor displays moderate
knowledge of (ISC)2 curriculum, resources and materials. Demonstrates fair knowledge in some domains.
Skilled
Instructor displays clear knowledge of
(ISC)2 curriculum resources, materials and clear knowledge of all domains.
Mastery
Instructor displays strong knowledge of
(ISC)2 curriculum resources, materials and in all domains and utilized presentations to significantly enhance
the curriculum.
Keywords:
Instructor Evaluation Scoring Rubric
Subjects:
(General)
Types:
(Other)
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More (General) rubrics
More (Other) rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n232
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.