- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Group Presentation Full Evaluation rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Group Presentation Full Evaluation Group Presentation Rubric-Teacher Evaluation Groups create a review of an assigned chapter. Present their review to the class. Full Evaluation Rubric Code: U28449 By lmjweber Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: (General) Type: Presentation Grade Levels: 9-12

Teacher Evaluation 70 %
	Failed 0 pts	Poor 7 pts	Fair 8 pts	Good 9 pts	Excellent 10 pts
Oral Presentation Skills	Failed Did not attempt	Poor Great difficulty communicating ideas. Poor voice projection. Little preparation or incomplete work.	Fair Some difficulty communicating ideas, due to voice projection, lack of preparation, or incomplete work	Good Communicates ideas with proper voice projection. Adequate preparation and delivery.	Excellent Communicates ideas with enthusiasm, proper voice projection, appropriate language, and clear delivery.
Creativity	Failed Did not attempt	Poor Repetitive with little or no variety; insufficient use of multimedia	Fair Little or no variation; material presented with little originality or interpretation	Good Some originality apparent; good variety and blending of materials/media	Excellent Very original presentation of material; uses the unexpected to full advantage; captures audience's attention
Presentation Skills	Failed Did not attempt	Poor Inaudible or too loud; no eye contact; rate too slow/fast; speaker seemed uninterested and used monotone	Fair Some mumbling; little eye contact; uneven rate; little or no expression	Good Clear articulation but not as polished	Excellent Poised, clear articulation; proper volume; steady rate; good posture and eye contact; enthusiasm; confidence
Class Response	Failed Did not attempt	Poor Incoherent; audience lost interest and could not determine the point of the presentation	Fair Some related facts but went off topic and lost the audience; mostly presented facts with little or no imagination	Good Presented facts with some interesting "twists"; held the audience's attention most of the time	Excellent Involved the audience in the presentation; points made in creative way; held the audience's attention throughout
Presentation Length	Failed Did not attempt	Poor Too long or too short; ten or more minutes above or below the allotted time	Fair Within six minutes of allotted time +/–	Good Within four minutes of allotted time +/–	Excellent Within two minutes of allotted time +/–
Subject Knowledge	Failed Does not understand	Poor Does not have grasp of information; student cannot answer questions about subject.	Fair Uncomfortable with information and is able to answer only rudimentary questions.	Good At ease with expected answers to all questions, but fails to elaborate.	Excellent Demonstrates full knowledge (more than required) by answering all class questions with explanations and elaboration.
Graphics	Failed Did not use graphics	Poor Used superfluous graphics or no graphics	Fair Occasionally uses graphics that rarely support text and presentation.	Good Graphics relate to text and presentation	Excellent Graphics explain and reinforce screen text and presentation.
Mathematical Content	Failed More than 5 errors.	Poor Includes 4-5 errors.	Fair Includes 2-3 errors.	Good Includes 1-2 errors.	Excellent No errors in work.
Group Member Evaluation 20 %
	Failed 0 pts	Poor 7 pts	Fair 8 pts	Good 9 pts	Excellent 10 pts
Group Work Ethic How well member worked within the group	Failed Did not work with others at all	Poor Cannot work with others in most situations. Cannot share decisions or responsibilities.	Fair Works with others, but has difficulty sharing decisions and responsibilities.	Good Works well with others. Takes part in most decisions and contributes fair share to group.	Excellent Works well with others. Assumes a clear role and related responsibilities. Motivates others to do their best.
Contribution to Project Contributed to all aspects of the project	Failed Did not contribute at all	Poor Did not work to complete project. Input was inaccrurate. Little or no creativity was expressed. Other group members did much of the work.	Fair Incomplete project. Input was useful. Some creativity was expressed. Some work redone by other group members.	Good Worked to complete project. Input was accurate, and useful. Creativity was expressed.	Excellent Worked to complete project. Input was valuable, accurate, and useful. Creativity was expressed and welcomed by the group.
Participation Was an active member of the group	Failed Did not participate	Poor Did less work than others Did not meet group member(s) at agreed times and places	Fair Did almost as much work as others Could be coaxed into meeting with other group member(s)	Good Did an equal share of the work Worked agreeably with group member(s) concerning times and places to meet	Excellent Did a full share of the work--or more Took the initiative in helping the group get organized
Cooperation Showed responsibility to the group by keeping their commitment and accomplishing what was agreed upon	Failed Did not cooperate	Poor Generally uncooperative in working with others, listening to feedback, and exchanging tasks.	Fair Seemed less engaged with others, preferring to work alone. Feedback is sometimes	Good Offers encouragement to other partners. Accepts the comments and feedback of others, but with some reticence	Excellent Organized the information. Works very well with others, assisting others as needed.
Attendance Attendance Was on time and attended group work sessions	Failed Did not attend any meetings	Poor Missed one or more agreed upon meetings	Fair was tardy to one or more agreed upon meetings	Good attended all meetings and was on time	Excellent Attended all meetings and was on time and prepared to work. Was instrumental in arranging work session.
Communication discusses project electronically or in person	Failed No Attempt at Communication	Poor Seemed bored with conversations about the presentation was very slow to or would not answer emails little or no group communication	Fair Listened to others; on some occasions, made suggestions Very slow to answer emails (longer than 1 week) seldom or never initiated communication with group	Good Participated in discussions about the presentation Answered email in 2-3 days sometimes initiated communication with group	Excellent Provided many ideas for the development of the presentation Prompt response to emails usually 1 day or less often initiating communication with group
Self Evaluation 10 %
	Failed 0 pts	Poor 7 pts	Fair 8 pts	Good 9 pts	Excellent 10 pts
Preparation I was prepared for all group meetings.	Failed	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent
Discussion Contribution I contributed appropriately to group discussions.	Failed	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent
Activity Contribution I contributed appropriately to group activities.	Failed	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent
Respect I was respectful of other members ideas and opinions.	Failed	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent
Group Work	Failed I did not attempt	Poor I cannot work with others in most situations. I cannot share decisions or responsibilities.	Fair I work with others, but have difficulty sharing decisions and responsibilities.	Good I work well with others. I take part in most decisions and contribute a fair share to group.	Excellent I work well with others. I assume a clear role and related responsibilities. I motivate others to do their best.

Subjects:

Types:

Presentation

Discuss this rubric