Skip to main content

iRubric: Educational Leadership Philosophy Paper rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Educational Leadership Philosophy Paper Leadership Profile Paper Write a personal philosophy based on educational leadership. Connect personal beliefs with language and content learned in this course. Rubric Code: U23X36W By abnettj Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Education Type: Writing Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate

Criterion
	Excellent Exceeds assignment objectives 5 pts	Good Meets assignment objectives 4 pts	Fair Assignment objectives minimally met 2 pts	Poor Does not meet assignment objectives 1 pts
Content Content of paper addresses the three criteria: description/role, Context analysis, synthesis	Excellent Content addresses assignment including course concepts. Content and purpose of the writing are clear. Content answers all of the questions	Good Content is adequate and addresses assignment. Many of the questions are answered.	Fair Content addresses assignment, inadequately Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.	Poor Content is incomplete. Questions were not adequately answered.
Leadership Traits/Characteristics	Excellent Student expresses many interpretations about the leadership concepts. Makes inferences about the leadership concepts with a high degree of relevance.	Good Student expresses considerable interpretations about the leadership concepts. Makes inferences about the leadership concepts with considerable relevance.	Fair Student expresses some interpretations about the leadership concepts. Makes inferences about the leadership concepts with some relevance.	Poor Student expresses few interpretations about the leadership concepts. Makes inferences about the leadership concepts with limited relevance.
Leadership Theory/Style	Excellent Clear and concise presentation of either the common leadership theme(s) or the leadership theme(s) resonating with the student.	Good Some discussion of either the common leadership theme(s) or the leadership theme(s) resonating with the student.	Fair Some discussion of either the common leadership theme(s) or the leadership theme(s) resonating with the student. The discussion needs further development, or clarification.	Poor Little to no discussion of either the common leadership theme(s) or the leadership theme(s) resonating with the student.
Support/Evidence/critical analysis	Excellent Student supports interpretations about the leadership theme Inferences show sophisticated thinking about the concepts. Student applies knowledge about elements of leadership and uses the knowledge to support inferences with a high degree of relevance.	Good Student supports interpretations about the leadership theme Inferences show deep thinking about the concepts. Student applies knowledge about elements of leadership and uses the knowledge to support inferences with considerable relevance.	Fair Student supports interpretations about the leadership concepts Inferences show straight-forward understanding about the concepts. Student applies knowledge about elements of leadership and uses the knowledge to support inferences with some relevance.	Poor Student does not explain interpretations about the leadership concept. Inferences show simple understanding about the concepts. support inferences with limited relevance.
Organization & Structure Clear Introduction, body & conclusion	Excellent -Structure of the paper is clear and easy to follow. - Paragraph transitions are logical and maintain the flow of thought throughout the paper. - Conclusion is logical and flows from the body of the paper.	Good - Structure is mostly clear and easy to follow. - Paragraph transitions are present. - Conclusion is logical.	Fair - Structure of the paper is not easy to follow. - Paragraph transitions need improvement. - Conclusion is missing, or if provided, does not flow from the body of the paper.	Poor - Organization and structure detract from the message of the writer. - Paragraphs are disjointed and lack transition of thoughts.
Format	Excellent Format enhances readability of paper. Paper is formatted in APA style with few errors	Good Format is good. Paper is formatted in APA style with many errors	Fair Format is difficult to follow Paper is not formatted in APA style or too many errors	Poor Paper lacks most elements of correct formatting. Paper is not formatted in APA style
Grammar, Punctuation & Spelling	Excellent - Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct. - Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.	Good - Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed with minor errors. Spelling is correct.	Fair - Paper contains few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors. - Language lacks clarity or includes the use of some jargon or conversational tone.	Poor - Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors. - Language uses jargon or conversational tone.

Keywords:

Personal Philosophy

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Health rubrics

More Exam rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n202