iRubric: Research Presentation Rubric

There was no discernible organization apparent in the presentation. It was unfocused, confusing, and difficult to understand and follow.

There was some discernible organization apparent in the presentation, but several errors in grammar, spelling, capitalization, and spelling detracted from the overall meaning and intent of the presentation. Perhaps the media choice was not appropriate for the chosen topic.

The presentation was organized and focused on the chosen topic. The chosen medium or media was appropriate. Overall the written text followed the rules of standard English. If there were any errors, they did not occlude the overall meaning and intent of the presentation.

The presentation was very well organized and clearly focused on the chosen topic. It was visually appealing, and all written text followed the rules of standard English, or if there were any errors, they were minor errors, they did not detract from the intent and appeal of the presentation.

The presentation was 0-1 and/or the topic was not explained/described or supported by details/examples.

The presentation was about 2-4 slides long, but the topic may not have been adequately explained/described and supported by valid details/examples.

The presentation was about 5-7 slides long, and the topic was adequately explained/described and supported by valid details/examples.

The presentation was 8 slides long, and the topic was thoroughly explained/described and supported by valid details/examples from credible sources.