Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Critical Review: Film to Text rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Critical Review: Film to Text
Compare/Contrast Writing: Play to movie
The purpose of this rubric is to allow the student to know what the expectations are for writing this critical review of a YAL based feature film. This will require a comparison of the two literary formats film and text.
Rubric Code:
SXW7669
By
clarkchar
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
9-12, Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
C/C Essay
Excellent
5 pts
Good
4 pts
Fair
3 pts
Needs Improvement
2 pts
Introductory paragraph
Excellent
The writer has an introductory paragraph including a topic sentence.
Good
The writer has a topic sentence but does not flow into an introductory paragraph.
Fair
The writer has an introduction mentioning the subjects but not the topic of writing.
Needs Improvement
The writer does not have an introductory paragraph or topic sentence.
Comparison points
Excellent
There are (3) three clear comparison examples between the movie and the book.
Good
There are (2) two comparison examples between the movie and the book.
Fair
There is (1)one comparative example between the movie and the book .
Needs Improvement
Student has not provided any clear comparative examples between the movie and the book.
Contrasting points
Excellent
There are (3) three clear contrasting examples between the movie and the book.
Good
There are (2) two clear contrasting examples between the movie and the book.
Fair
There is (1) one clear contrasting example between the movie and the book.
Needs Improvement
Student has not provided any clear contrasting examples between the movie and the book.
Transitions
Excellent
The paper moves<BR>
smoothly from one<BR>
idea to the next.<BR>
The paper uses comparison<BR>
and contrast<BR>
transition words to<BR>
show relationships between<BR>
ideas. The<BR>
paper uses a variety<BR>
of sentence structures<BR>
and transitions.
Good
The paper moves from<BR>
one idea to the next,<BR>
but there is little<BR>
variety. The paper<BR>
uses comparison<BR>
and contrast transition<BR>
words to show<BR>
relationships between<BR>
ideas.
Fair
Some transitions work<BR>
well; but connections<BR>
between other ideas<BR>
are fuzzy.
Needs Improvement
The transitions<BR>
between ideas<BR>
are unclear or<BR>
nonexistent.
Benefits and/or Drawbacks
Excellent
There are (3) three benefits and/or drawbacks noted between the reading and the viewing. This could include aspects of the film where the presentation enhanced the story, for example, through the use of music.
Good
There are (2) two benefits and/or drawbacks noted between the reading and the viewing.
Fair
There is (1) one benefit or drawback noted between the reading and the viewing.
Needs Improvement
This element was not clearly discussed.
Character performances
Excellent
The writer thoroughly discusses the performances of at least (2) two characters. This may include: age, origin, personality, visual depiction.
Good
The writer discusses the performances of at least (2) two characters. This may include: age, origin, personality, visual depiction.
Fair
The writer discusses the performance of (1) one character. This may include: age, origin, personality, visual depiction.
Needs Improvement
The writer discusses the performance of (1) one character. Very little is discussed.
Accuracy in use of terms
Excellent
The writer uses terms such as: genre, setting, antagonist/
protagonist, voice, and tone correctly.
Good
The writer uses a few literary terms, and they are used correctly.
Fair
The writer uses a few literary terms, but there is confusion in their usage.
Needs Improvement
The writer does not use any literary terms correctly in this writing.
Recommendation for curricular use
Excellent
The writer offers several recommendations for curricular inclusion or exclusion and provides rationale.
Good
The writer offers some recommendations for curricular inclusion or exclusion and provides rationale.
Fair
The writer offers some recommendations for curricular inclusion or exclusion but offers no rationale.
Needs Improvement
The writer offers few to none recommendations for curricular inclusion or exclusion with no rationale.
Grammar & Spelling (Conventions)
Excellent
Writer makes no<BR>
errors in grammar or<BR>
spelling that distract<BR>
the reader from the<BR>
content.
Good
Writer makes 1-2<BR>
errors in grammar or<BR>
spelling that distract<BR>
the reader from the<BR>
content.
Fair
Writer makes 3-4<BR>
errors in grammar or<BR>
spelling that distract<BR>
the reader from the<BR>
content.
Needs Improvement
Writer makes more<BR>
than 4 errors in<BR>
grammar or spelling<BR>
that distract the<BR>
reader from the<BR>
content.
Conclusion
Excellent
The writer summarizes the review in a clearly written conclusion.
Good
The writer has a summary statement, but it does not flow into a conclusion.
Fair
The writer has a conclusion, but it uses the same words as used in the introductory paragraph.
Needs Improvement
The writer does not have a summary statement or conclusion. The paper just ends.
Keywords:
Compare/Contrast Essay, Young Adult Lit, Writing, Essays, English, Technology
Subjects:
Communication
Computers
English
Journalism
Test Preparation
(General)
Types:
Project
Presentation
Assignment
Writing
ePortfolio
(Other)
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Communication rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n178
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.