Skip to main content

iRubric: Oral Communication VALUE Rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Oral Communication VALUE Rubric 
Oral Communication VALUE Rubric
Oral communication is a prepared, purposeful presentation designed to increase knowledge, to foster understanding, or to promote change in the listeners' attitudes, values, beliefs, or behaviors. Oral communication takes many forms. This rubric is specifically designed to evaluate oral presentations of a single speaker at a time and is best applied to live or video-recorded presentations. For panel presentations or group presentations, it is recommended that each speaker be evaluated separately. This rubric best applies to presentations of sufficient length such that a central message is conveyed, supported by one or more forms of supporting materials and includes a purposeful organization. An oral answer to a single question not designed to be structured into a presentation does not readily apply to this rubric. Courtesy of AAC&U: http://aacu.org/value/index.cfm
Rubric Code: S7W3B4
By mgraybill
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: (General)  
Type: (Other)  
Grade Levels: K-5

Powered by iRubric Oral Presentation Rubric B
  Excellent

4 pts

Proficient

3 pts

Basic

2 pts

Below Basic

1 pts

Organization

Excellent

-Specific introduction and conclusion
-Sequenced material within the body
-Cohesive presentation content
Proficient

-Specific introduction and conclusion
-Sequenced material within the body
-Cohesive presentation content
Basic

-Specific introduction and conclusion
-Sequenced material within the body is inconsistent
Below Basic

-Specific introduction and conclusion
-No sequence in material
Language

Excellent

-Educated and imaginative
-Enhance the effectiveness of the presentation
-Correct grammar
-Appropriate to audience
Proficient

-Thoughtful
-Support the effectiveness of the presentation
-Correct grammar
-Appropriate to audience
Basic

-Not interesting
-Partially support the effectiveness of the presentation
-Correct grammar
-Appropriate to audience
Below Basic

-Unclear
-Minimally support the effectiveness of the presentation
-Occasional mistakes in grammar
-Appropriate to audience
Delivery

Excellent

-Good posture
-Eye contact with the audience most of the time
-Appropriate gesture and expression
-Deliverance with confidence
Proficient

-Good posture
-Frequent eye contact with the audience
-Appropriate gesture and expression
Basic

-Intermitten good posture
-Occasional eye contact with the audience
-Appropriate gesture and expression
-Recurrent fidgets
Below Basic

-Poor posture
-Seldom eye contact with the audience
-Not enough or too much gesture and expression
-Constant fidgets
Content

Excellent

-Topic clearly identified
-In-depth explanations of required information
-Appropriate reference to information
-Presenter's credibility/ authority on the topic clearly established
Proficient

-Topic clearly identified
-Moderate-level explanations of required information
-Appropriate reference to information
-Presenter's credibility/ authority on the topic reasonably established
Basic

-Topic clearly identified
-Explanations of required information
-Appropriate reference to information
-Presenter's credibility/ authority on the topic established
Below Basic

-Topic not clearly identified
-Limited explanations of required information
-Presenter's credibility/ authority on the topic not established
Big Idea

Excellent

Big idea is precisely stated, appropriately repeated, memorable, and strongly supported.
Proficient

Big idea is clear and consistent with the supporting material.
Basic

Big idea is understandable but is not often repeated and is not memorable.
Below Basic

Big idea is not clear or explicitly stated in the presentation.
Works Cited

This category will apply in case a presentation is supported by written materials.
Excellent

-All sources properly cited in both paper and Works Cited page
-No errors in citation format
Proficient

-All sources properly cited in both paper and Works Cited page
-Some errors in citation format
Basic

-All sources properly cited in both paper and Works Cited page
-No errors in citation format
Below Basic

-All sources properly cited in Works Cited page but not in paper
-No Works Cited page
-Errors in citation format



Keywords:
  • Oral communication, Central message, Delivery techniques, Supporting material, Language

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n178