Skip to main content
iRubric: Peer teaching of a receptive skill rubric

iRubric: Peer teaching of a receptive skill rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Peer teaching of a receptive skill 
Peer teaching of skill development
Rubric Code: S3X867
By laravcc
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Foreign Languages  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Assessment of Teaching Reading Less
  Excellent

(N/A)

Good

(N/A)

Poor

(N/A)

Introduction to Lesson

Excellent

Introduction to the lesson was enthusiastic, utilized a visual, and/or stimulated interest in the activity. This stage activated student's prior knowledge.
Good

Introduction to the lesson was somewhat enthusiastic. An attempt to stimulate interest. Student's prior knowledge was considered, but minimally.
Poor

Introduction to the lesson was less than enthusiastic and didn't stimulated interest in the topic. Student's prior knowledge was not considered.
Skill Development Component

Excellent

Skill development activies were presented with clarity and included opportunities for practice, moving from main ideas to detailed information. Ss had a reason to read/listen.
Good

Skill development activies were presented with clarity but did not provide adequate time for practice, or did not progress logically. Reason to read/listen was unclear.
Poor

Skill development activities were not well planned or explained clearly. They did not move from simple to more difficult. No reason to read/listen.
Lesson Presentation

Excellent

T engaged Ss and was aware of the Ss' learning needs regarding the pacing of the lesson, Ss' ability to comprehend the information, and included relevant and useful practice tasks
Good

T did not fully engage the Ss or was not fully aware of the Ss' learning needs regarding the pacing of the lesson, Ss' ability to comprehend the information, or did not include relevant and useful practice tasks
Poor

T was unable to keep Ss engaged or misunderstood SS comprehension, questions, or interest.
Content

Excellent

Content of the lesson was relavent, appropriate and engaging. Topic and language was suitable for the level.
Good

Content of the lesson included relavent, appropriate or engaging information but not all three criteria. Topic and language were somewhat suitable for the level.
Poor

Content was not relavent, appropriate or engaging. Topic and language were inappropriate for the level.
Organization

Excellent

There was an organized flow to the lesson. Concepts built upon one another. T had everything needed for the lesson and was well prepared for problems and questions.
Good

Slightly unorganized but satisfactory overall. Had everything needed for the presentation, but should have prepared more for problems and questions.
Poor

The information was presented in a confusing manner. The T was not prepared with everything needed for the presentation, and could not manage problems or questions.
Timing

Excellent

Lesson was between 40-45 minutes in length. Time was used well and effectively.
The lesson did not feel rushed and there was a clear finish.
Good

Lesson was more than 5 minutes under time but the T used the extra time to reinforce the content. The lesson had a clear finish, though early.
Poor

The presentation was more than 5 minutes under or over time and the T used the remaining time inappropriately (e.g. moved into personal issues or side talk) or was in the middle of something at the buzzer.
Visual/Learning Aids

Excellent

T effectively used appropriate visual/learning aids which provided an opportunity for the Ss to practice their new skill. Visual aids appeared to be thoughtfully selected.
Good

T had visual/learning aids to support learning but used them minimally. Some thought and effort appeared to be put into the choice of aids but more effort would may have improved the lesson.
Poor

T did not have visual/learning aids or had aids that were not particularly helpful in supporting skill development or reinforcing learning. Minimal thought or effort appeared to be put into the choice of aids.
Non-verbal/Verbal Communication

Excellent

Maintained eye contact.
Excellent rapport with Ss. Relaxed, friendly approach.
Fluent, clear speech
Confident but not intimidating, appropriate language choices for level.
Good

Maintained eye contact.
Good rapport with Ss. Relaxed, friendly approach.
Fast or quiet speech, lacking intonation.
Showed hesitation or nervousness. Some inappropriate language for level.
Poor

Poor eye contact.
Little rapport with Ss. Nervous, anxious appearance.
Inappropriate use of language for level.
Focused on lesson plan, not Ss.



Keywords:
  • Assessment, teaching, social work, skill development



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n202