- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Multimedia Literature Presentations rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Multimedia Literature Presentations Teamwork Peer Evaluation Rubric Students chose from a variety of presentation styles and presented one or more books to their classmates. Rubric Code: S2AW63 By astreet Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Presentation Grade Levels: 6-8

Presentation Rubric
	Excellent 5 pts	Good 4 pts	Average 3 pts	Needs Improvement 2 pts
Planning
Materials	Excellent Materials used were ready at assigned time and fit into topic well	Good Materials used were ready at assigned time and related to topic	Average Lacking in a few important materials, some did not relate to topic	Needs Improvement Lacking in materials, materials used were not related to topic
Technological Considerations	Excellent Technology used was prepared and practiced IN ADVANCE to ensure everything worked	Good Technology was prepared in advance, but difficulties arose because it was not tested prior to presentation; difficulties were quickly overcome	Average Technology was prepared in advance, but difficulties arose because it was not tested prior to presentation; difficulties caused rescheduling	Needs Improvement Technology was not prepared in advance, and/or could not be made to work
Content
Relevance	Excellent Literature chosen interests students	Good Literature chosen might interest some students	Average Literature chosen might interest a few students	Needs Improvement Literature chosen would not interest students
Accuracy	Excellent Content accurately represents aspects of the literature chosen and features the literature prominently	Good Content accurately represents one aspect of literature chosen	Average Content is loosely based on literature but is not an accurate representation	Needs Improvement Content is not based on literature or gives away too much about the literature
Engagement
Audience reaction	Excellent Audience reacts positively to presentation, clearly enjoys and understands content, and sincerely applauds	Good Audience reacts positively to presentation and applauds at end	Average Audience reacts neutrally to presentation and claps only out of politeness	Needs Improvement Audience reacts negatively to presentation and claps weakly only out of politeness
Audience involvement	Excellent Presentation actively involves audience and/or audience intently watches presentation	Good Audience reacts well to presentation, showing interest	Average Audience seems confused while politely watching	Needs Improvement Audience fidgets often and struggles to stay focused on presentation due to lack of quality