Skip to main content

iRubric: Counseling Treatment Plan rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Counseling Treatment Plan Counseling Treatment Plan Prepare a treatment plan using the DO A CLIENT MAP format. Treatments are to be evidence-based, sources documented. Rubric Code: RX63W53 By jbrocato Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Psychology Type: Project Grade Levels: Graduate

Criterion
	Excellent/Good This treatment plan is evidence based and clear enough that it could be implemented by others. 30 pts	Good/Fair This treatment plan has all essential elements outlined but needs expansion of and clarity on major elements 28 pts	Fair/Poor Treatment plan does not address all the required components or is not adequately developed for implementation. 26 pts	Unsatisfactory Treatment is incomplete and diagnosis, goals and/or interventions inaccurate. 23 pts
Diagnosis 5 pts DSM-IV Multiaxial	Excellent/Good Well supported diagnosis on all 5 axes. Correct name and code for Axis I and II. GAF within 10 points of estimate	Good/Fair Provides diagnosis on all 5 axes. Misses the presence of multiple diagnoses or accepts previous diagnosis provided that appears inaccurate. Most names and codes correct. GAF within 20 points.	Fair/Poor Misses one or more axes. Axis I is incorrect or name and code is inaccurate. GAF not sufficiently accurate.	Unsatisfactory Only provides Axis I and II. Proposed diagnosis does not match client data.
Objectives of Treatment 5 pts Goals Conceptualization of Client Issues Client Readiness for Change,Client's expectations of counseling	Excellent/Good Goals are appropriate to case conceptualization and diagnosis. Goals are feasible and sufficient to address the counseling issues. Client involvement in setting goals.	Good/Fair Goals are appropriate for type of client in general not clearly linked to a conceptualization of the client. Goals may be somewhat idealistic or insufficient to address the specific client issues. Goals planned by student and supervisor.	Fair/Poor Goals are stated in unclear or very general manner. Limited conceptualization of the client such that goals not specific to this client but rather universal. Goals are unrealistic or insufficient to assist client. Goals were provided by the supervisor or staff.	Unsatisfactory Case conceptualization minimal, missing, or inaccurate. Goals nonspecific and insufficient.
Assessments 5 pts Clinical interview summary Any formal and informal testing	Excellent/Good Evidence of a clear understanding of the client and the environmental context of the problems. Used or suggests relevant assessment measures	Good/Fair Evidence of an adequate understanding of the client and the environmental context. Does not discuss assessment measures.	Fair/Poor Incomplete assessment of client and/or environmental context. Does not discuss assessment measures	Unsatisfactory Very limited clinical interview with insufficient information about essential client and environmental factors.
Interventions 10 pts Specific evidence-based approaches and strategies to guide treatment.	Excellent/Good Interventions are appropriate and specific to the client at this time. Interventions are supported by empirical literature or professional literature.	Good/Fair Interventions are appropriate for the client diagnosis or counseling issues. Some of the interventions are supported by professional and empirical literature.	Fair/Poor Interventions are appropriate for clients with this diagnosis and age in general. Many of the interventions are insufficiently and/or inaccurately described. Relies on the textbook for interventions.	Unsatisfactory Interventions not sufficiently developed or inappropriate for the client. No empirical support provided for the interventions
Nature and Focus of Treatment 2 pts Directive vs Evocative Individual, Group, Family, Self-Help Frequency of sessions	Excellent/Good Selects the appropriate amount of structure and direction. Selects an effective mode of treatment. Selects appropriate frequency of treatment.	Good/Fair Selects two of the three aspects of nature and focus in treament appropriate to the client.	Fair/Poor Incomplete discussion of the nature and focus of treatment and/or inappropriate selection of two of the three aspects/	Unsatisfactory Does not address the nature and focus of treatment.
Adjunctive Therapy 2 pts Support Groups Community Resources Psychoeducation	Excellent/Good Selects additional approaches to manage the environmental aspects of the case. These are specific to appropriate Milwaukee community resources.	Good/Fair Selects additional approaches to manage the environmental aspects of the case. Does not give specifics about the resources.	Fair/Poor Alludes to resources in a very general way, such as "social support group"or "psychoeducational group" without any consideration of client specifics.	Unsatisfactory Does not address any adjunctive therapies as part of the plan.
Prognosis 1 pts nature and severity of the problems client's motivation for change.	Excellent/Good Uses empirical literature and client history and motivational level to formulate a prognosis.	Good/Fair General prognosis for client's age, gender, and diagnosis. Uses client history or motivational level or empirical literature to formulate a prognosis for this client	Fair/Poor General prognosis for client's age, gender, and diagnosis. Not particular to client's history, motivation, and empirical literature.	Unsatisfactory Inaccurate or vague prognosis unsupported by data and empirical literature

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Accounting rubrics

More Exam rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n178