iRubric: Journal article Review rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Journal article Review Journal article Review This is a rubric designed to measure a student's reflection and application on an assigned evidenced-based journal article. Rubric Code: R9799C By llabanca Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Nursing Type: Project Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Journal Article Reflection
	Poor A poor job of providing the required information is performed by the writer. 0 pts	Fair The assigned category needs work. 1 pts	Good The writer does a good job applying the category to the journal article. 2 pts	Excellent The writer completely covers all required information. 3 pts
Citation, journal and grammar.	Poor No attempt is made at referencing according to APTA guidelines. The article is neither current or from a peer-reviewed Nursing journal. The writer's use of grammar is very poor and/or there are numerous spelling errors throughout the summary.	Fair The reference citation has more than one error as it is written. The article is not current or the journal is not peer-reviewed. There are numerous grammar and spelling errors throughout the summary.	Good The reference citation has one error. The article is both current and from a peer reviewed Nursing journal. There are some spelling and grammar errors throughout the summary.	Excellent No errors exist in the citation. The article is both current and from a peer reviewed Nursing journal. No errors exist in grammar or spelling.
Summary	Poor No summary is given. The author(s) key points are not identified.	Fair A summary of the article is attempted, but is severly lacking in more than one area. The author(s) key points are poorly identified.	Good A summary of the article is provided, but is lacking in one area. The author(s) key points are clearly identified but not well developed.	Excellent A brief summary of the article is given with all the required information. The author(s) key points are clearly identified and well developed.
Implications	Poor No implications are mentioned.	Fair One implication is mentioned, but is poorly developed in the reflection.	Good One or more implications are given and are sufficently clarified.	Excellent Implications are clearly explicated and student has thoughtfully demonstrated the integration of this new knowledge into the nursing profession.