Skip to main content
iRubric: Wikispace Rubric

iRubric: Wikispace Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Wikispace Rubric 
Rubric to evaluate student-created wikis. Students organized into groups of 3 or 4. A great wiki will: have accurate content, show open communication, be original, be interactive, demonstrate proper language use (i.e, grammar and spelling), and contain citations for content and images. All group members must edit and contribute to the site.
Rubric Code: R7X62A
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Wikispace Project Rubric
  Unfulfilled

Not included or no evidence present

0 pts

Poor

Effort less than expected to fulfill goals of project

3 pts

Fair

Minimal effort put forth to fulfill goals of project

6 pts

Good

Extra effort put forth to fulfill goals of project

8 pts

Excellent

Effort above and beyond what expected to fulfill goals of project

10 pts

Science behind the project
Triple Weight
Content

Key scientific concepts and ideas, including appropriate background

Unfulfilled
Poor

Minimal or missing explanations; no details or examples; multiple factual errors
Fair

Essential knowledge included; very few details or examples; 1-2 factual errors
Good

Essential knowledge conveyed with details and examples; no factual errors
Excellent

In depth understanding conveyed with multiple details and examples
Overall Wiki
Creativity & Originality

Unfulfilled
Poor

No original input or thought; little to no creativity
Fair

Minor evidence of original thinking; some aspects of project presented creatively
Good

Shows evidence of critical thought; many of the components presented in a creative manner
Excellent

Many original ideas presented in unique, creative format throughout project
Technology Use & Interactivity

Unfulfilled
Poor

No real effort to take advantage of technology; no effort to involve the visitor; no hyperlinks included or links to irrelevant material; navigation on wiki cumbersome
Fair

Some effort made to take advantage of technology through the use of some sound or video to involve the visitor; hyperlinks included, some may be broken or to irrelevant material; some material difficult to find
Good

An effort made to take advantage of technology through the use of sound and/or video to actively involve the visitor; hyperlinks included; easily navigate to most material
Excellent

Wide use of web 2.0 tools and other technology; considerable use of sound and/or video to actively involve the visitor; hyperlinks used effectively; navigation easy, relevant material at a visitor's fingertips
Graphics & Layout

Unfulfilled
Poor

Consists of little more than written comments; layout unappealing or cluttered/confusing; ineffective organization/format; fonts used ineffectually
Fair

Text and images; some graphics randomly chosen or included without context; usable layout, but unappealing or boring; fonts do not distract from overall layout
Good

Text and graphics work together to enhance reader understanding; pleasing, eye-catching layout; fonts do not distract from overall layout
Excellent

Text and graphics thoughtfully drive reader experience; exceptional, logical, user-friendly layout; fonts reinforce organization and used effectually
Spelling and Grammar

Unfulfilled
Poor

There are errors in spelling, punctuation or grammar.
Fair
Good
Excellent

There are no errors in spelling, punctuation or grammar.
Citations
Your source materials and graphics were acquired somewhere. All material should be appropriately cited and follow APA format. Plagiarism will earn a grade of zero for the entire project.
Citations

Unfulfilled

Nothing is cited and/or material is cut & pasted; in other words, the project is plagiarized. The overall project grade is a zero.
Poor

Most material not cited; most images/graphics not labeled with source; improper format for sources
Fair

Some material cited; some images/graphics labeled with source; inconsistent format for sources
Good

Most material cited; most images/graphics labeled with source; proper format for sources
Excellent

All material cited; all images/graphics labeled with source; proper format for sources
Collaboration: Group Effort
Evidence of open communication and problem solving via discussions of content, organization, and assignment of duties necessary to complete the project
Communication

Unfulfilled
Poor

Minimal communication.
Fair

Some communication between group members; all communication led by single individual with little to no comment by other members.
Good

Communication between most members evident.
Excellent

Communication consistent and evident throughout project between all members; timely exchanges via multiple platforms to deal with problems/issues as arose.
Problem Solving

Unfulfilled
Poor

Communication between group members to address goals or issues nonexistent.
Fair

Most group members did not determine goals or address problems/issues or were passively involved.
Good

Most members actively participated to address goals and issues/problems of project.
Excellent

All members actively discussed goals and dealt with problems/issues in a timely fashion.
Collaboration: Individual Effort
These points are for your individual efforts toward the overall project.
Contribution

Unfulfilled
Poor

Contribution is minimal in material collected and development of format and/or content and/or technology used; often out of sync with group's pace or progress.
Fair

Participated in the collection of material or to the development of the format and/or content or suggested appropriate technology; timing of contribution sometimes helpful to group.
Good

Participated in the collection of material and to the development of the format and/or content and/or to use of appropriate technology; contribution timely.
Excellent

Collected a great deal of material; key to development of format and content; suggested and provided appropriate technology; timely contribution facilitates whole group's progress.
Creation & Authorship

Unfulfilled
Poor

Creates a page or performs single edit or submits single change to existing page; provided little to no assistance in the creation of wiki's look and content.
Fair

Creates a page and/or performs single edit and/or submits single change to existing page; provided limited assistance in the creation of wiki's look and content.
Good

Creates a page(s), performs multiple edits, submits changes to existing pages; played an important role in the creation of the wiki's look and content.
Excellent

Actively involved in all aspects of wiki creation - pages, edits, submissions; took leadership role in creation of look and content.
Communication

Unfulfilled
Poor

Minimal input to development of wiki; minimal participation in discussion about content and organization.
Fair

Moderate input to development of wiki; moderate participation in discussion about content and organization.
Good

Adequate input to development of wiki; adequate participation in discussion about content and organization.
Excellent

Constant input to development of wiki; constant participation in discussion about content and organization.



Keywords:
  • Wiki Science Group HighSchool







Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n60