Skip to main content
iRubric: Gender Topics in Music Final Paper Rubric

iRubric: Gender Topics in Music Final Paper Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Gender Topics in Music Final Paper Rubric 
Song Literature Essay Questions Rubric
This rubric is for grading student's final paper.
Rubric Code: R4B388
By blasdeg
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Music  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate

Powered by iRubric Criterion
  Poor

5 pts

Fair

7 pts

Good

8 pts

Excellent

10 pts

Topic Choice

1 point
Poor

- Topic subject does not fit the assignment
Fair

-Topic subject fits the basic requirements of the assignment
- Topic examines the interaction of gender topics in music
Good

- Topic subject fits all the requirements of the assignment
- Topic examines the interaction of gender topics in music using a model of feminist inquiry covered in class
Excellent

- Topic subject fits all the requirements of the assignment
- Topic examines the interaction of a gender topic in music and builds on the existing literature to add something new to the field of feminist research
Thesis Development

2 points
Poor

- No Thesis statement
Fair

- Thesis statement exists but is weak
Good

- Thesis statement is clearly stated and covers who, what, when, and where and why type of questions.
Excellent

- Thesis statement is clearly stated, gives organization to the paper structure and addresses the significance of the research. i.e. How - specific examples are given and connected across genre. and Why - considers the larger significance.
Content Areas

2 points
Poor

Major required topics are missing completely or lacking adequate consideration
- Paper is well below required length
Fair

Most required content areas are addressed minimally.
- Paper meets the minimum required length
Good

All required content areas are addressed and supported with documented sources.
- Paper meets the minimum required length while fully addressing each area
- Body content is directly related to thesis
Excellent

All required content areas are addressed and covered in depth using a variety of documented sources.
- Paper meets the required length and ideas are fully developed with clarity and brevity
Documentation

1 point
Poor

- Paper lacks many elements of correct formatting such as citations, title page, references, page numbers.
Fair

- Paper follows most guidelines.
-Formatting is mostly accurate with most required components.
Good

- Paper follows all guidelines but contains slight errors in citation formatting.
Excellent

- Paper follows designated guidelines with all required components.
Source Use

2 points
Poor

- Paper does not include enough sources
- Sources are weak - too many internet sources
- Paper contains undocumented material that needs a citation
Fair

- Paper cites 5 print sources, but does not integrate the sources into the paper completely
- Paper contains some statements that would be stronger if a quotation or reference were used
Good

- Paper uses at least 5 print sources
- Quotes are relevant and add support to the thesis
Excellent

- Paper uses a variety of print sources, articles and internet sources
- Quotations flow smoothly in the text of the paper
Organization & Structure

1 point
Poor

- No structure present.
- Paragraphs too long and rambling.
- Information presented in list style without thesis statements and form.
Fair

- Introduction and/or conclusion missing.
- Paragraphs are disjointed and lack transition of thoughts.
Good

- Introduction does not preview all major points.
- Paragraph transitions need improvement.
- Conclusion does not flow well from the body of paper.
Excellent

- Structure of the paper is clear.
- Introduction previews all major points.
- Paragraph transitions are logical.
- Conclusion flows from the body of paper.
Grammar, Punctuation & Spelling

1 point
Poor

- Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.
- Language is confusing and hard to follow throughout.
- Language syntax is awkward or too informal most of the time.
Fair

- Paper contains few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors.
- Language is confusing occasionally.
- Language syntax is awkward or too informal occasionally.
Good

- Paper contains less than 1- 2 errors in grammar, punctuation and spelling.
- Language is understandable.
- Language syntax is mostly smooth and academic.
Excellent

- Paper contains no errors in grammar, punctuation or spelling.
- Language is clear and precise.
- Language syntax is smooth and academic.






Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n60