Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Community Research Essay rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Community Research Essay
Community Research Essay
This rubric was used for assessing a community based research essay. The students had submitted a pproposal for the essay. Each proposal contained: a description of the community controversy that was proposed for research; community based research plan that went beyond print or electronic sources.
Rubric Code:
R43C25
By
AMYMACPHERSON
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
(none)
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Criterion
Poor
(N/A)
Fair
(N/A)
Good
(N/A)
Excellent
(N/A)
Content & Development
Poor
- Content is incomplete.
- Major points about the controversy are not clear.
Essay does not address a true controversy as described in course
Fair
- Content is not comprehensive.
- Major points of a controversy are addressed, but not well supported.
- Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.
Good
- Content is fairly comprehensive. - Content is accurate and clearly presented
- Major points are stated but are not well supported.
- Content and purpose of the writing are clear.
Excellent
- Content is comprehensive.
- Content is accurate and clearly presented
- Major points are stated and are well supported.
- Content and purpose of the writing are clear and explained fully.
Organization & Structure
Poor
- Organization and structure detract from the message of the writer.
- The essay is disjointed and lacks transition of thoughts.
Fair
- Structure of the essay is not easy to follow.
- Transitions need improvement.
Good
- Structure of the essay is clear and easy to follow.
- Transitions are presented.
Excellent
- Structure of the essay is clear and easy to follow, and interesting.
- Transitions are excellent and aide the reader's understanding of the ideas presenmted.
Format
Poor
- Paper lacks or incorrectly uses many elements of correct MLA formattting.
- Essay is inadequate/excessive in length.
Fair
- Paper follows most MLA guidelines.
- Paper is over/ under necessary.
Good
- Paper follows designated MLA guidelines with only minor errors.
- Paper is the appropriate length as described for the assignment.
Excellent
-Paper follows designated MLA guidelines in all details without error.
- Paper is the appropriate length as described for the assignment.
Language Use
Poor
- Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.
- Language uses jargon or conversational tone.
Fair
- Paper contains few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors.
- Language includes the use of some jargon or conversational tone.
Good
- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed with a few exceptions; spelling is correct.
- Language is clear and precise; sentences display varied structure.
Excellent
Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.
- Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.
Community Research
Poor
-A plan for Community Research was not adequately explained in the appropriate section of the essay.
-The Community Research Plan was not followed, or problems were not explained clearly.
Fair
-A plan for Community Research was explained in the appropriate section of the essay.
-The Community Research Plan was followed, but problems were not explained clearly.
Good
-A plan for Community Research was clearly explained in the appropriate section of the essay.
-The Community Research Plan was followed, and problems were explained.
Excellent
-A plan for Community Research was clearly and specifically explained in the appropriate section of the essay.
-The Community Research Plan was followed, and problems were explained along with responses to the problems.
Requirements
Poor
-Essay did not follow the specified elelments of the assignment.
Specified sections of essay were missing or inadequate.
Fair
- The specified sections of the essay are present but all requirements are not adequately fulfilled.
Good
- The essay contains each of the specified elelments of the essay.
-The sections are clear and factually supported.
Excellent
- The essay contains each of the specified elelments of the essay.
-The sections are clear, factually supported, and written in an interesting factor that draws the reader to the essays main points.
Keywords:
Community Research, Controversy, writing, English, MLA Format
Subjects:
Accounting
Arts and Design
Biology
Business
Chemistry
Communication
Computers
Dance
Engineering
English
Finance
Foreign Languages
Geography
Geology
Health
History
Humanities
Journalism
Law
Math
Medical
Music
Philosophy
Physical Ed., Fitness
Physics
Political Science
Psychology
Science
Social Sciences
(General)
Types:
Exam
Homework
Project
Presentation
Assignment
Writing
(Other)
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Accounting rubrics
More Exam rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n60
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.