Skip to main content
iRubric: WVSU Comm Dept ePortfolio Assessment (draft) rubric

iRubric: WVSU Comm Dept ePortfolio Assessment (draft) rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
WVSU Comm Dept ePortfolio Assessment (draft) 
WVSU Comm Dept ePortfolio Assessment (draft)
Model based on rubric found at http://www.markville.ss.yrdsb.edu.on.ca/mm/UBC/510/eportfoliorubric.htm
Rubric Code: R27CB6
By Engprof
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Communication  
Type: ePortfolio  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric ePortfolio Rubric
  Superior

You attended to every detail with precision.

5 pts

Strong

Some minor problems distract. Your work is less precise than it could be.

4 pts

Adequate

Several deviations exist. Required information is missing.

3 pts

Weak

Expectations are barely met. Too many omissions or mistakes.

2 pts

Inadequate

A poor or limited attempt. Does not meet expectations.

1 pts

Selection

Selection of Learning Samples
Superior

All artifacts and work samples are clearly and directly related to the purpose of the portfolio.

-A wide variety of learning samples are used
Strong

-Many artifacts and work samples are clearly and directly related to the purpose of the portfolio.

-A strong variety of learning samples are used
Adequate

-Most artifacts and work samples are related to the purpose of the portfolio

- A variety of learning samples are used.
Weak

-Some artifacts and work samples are related to the purpose.

-Some variety of learning samples are used
Inadequate

-All artefacts are unrelated to the purpose of the portfolio

-All learning samples are of the same genre
Reflections

Superior

All reflections clearly describe why artifacts in the portfolio demonstrate achievement of each standard or goal and include goals for continued learning.

-All reflections illustrate the ability to effectively critique work and provide suggestions for constructive practical alternatives.
Strong

- Many reflections clearly describe why artifacts in the portfolio demonstrate achievement of each standard or goal and include goals for continued learning.

-Many reflections illustrate the ability to effectively critique work and provide suggestions for constructive practical alternatives.
Adequate

- Most of the reflections describe why artifacts in the portfolio demonstrate achievement of each standard or goal and include goals for future learning.

-Most of the reflections illustrate the ability to effectively critique work and provide suggestions for constructive practical alternatives.
Weak

-Some reflections describe why artifacts in the portfolio demonstrate achievement of each standard or goal and include goals for future learning.

-Some reflections illustrate the ability to effectively critique work and provide suggestions for constructive practical alternatives.
Inadequate

No reflections describe why artifacts in the portfolio demonstrate achievement of each standard or goal and do not include goals for future learning.

-No reflections illustrate the ability to effectively critique work or provide suggestions for constructive practical alternatives.
Writing Mechanics

Superior

-The writing demonstrates excellent control of usage and mechanics

-The relative absence of errors is impressive considering the complexity of the response.
Strong

-The writing demonstrates confident control of usage and mechanics

-The relative absence of errors is excellent considering the complexity of the response.
Adequate

-The writing demonstrates competent control of usage and mechanics

-Any errors do not reduce the clarity or interrupt the flow of the writing
Weak

The writing demonstrates general control of usage and mechanics

-Errors that are present may reduce the clarity or interrupt the flow of the response
Inadequate

-The writing demonstrates faltering control of usage and mechanics

-Errors reduce the clarity and interrupt the flow of the
Use of Multimedia

Superior

All of the photographs, graphics, sound and/or video enhance reflective statements, create interest, and are appropriate.
Strong

-Many of the photographs, graphics, sound and/or video enhance reflective statements, create interest, and are appropriate.
Adequate

- Most of the photographs, graphics, sound and/or video enhance reflective statements, create interest, and are appropriate.
Weak

-A few of the photographs, graphics, sound and/or video are inappropriate and do not enhance reflective statements or create interest, and are inappropriate.
Inadequate

-The photographs, graphics, sounds, and/or videos are inappropriate, do not enhance reflective statements, and are inappropriate are distracting decorations that create a busy feeling and detract from the content.
Ease of Navigation

Superior

-All of the portfolio navigation links and all sections connect back to the main table of contents.
-All external links to all connecting websites connect
Strong

-Many of the portfolio navigation links and all sections connect back to the main table of contents.
-Many external links to all connecting websites connect
Adequate

-Most of the portfolio navigation links and most sections (standards, artifacts, and reflections) connect back to the main table of contents.
-Most of the external links to connecting websites connect.
Weak

-Some of the portfolio navigation links and some sections (standards, artifacts, and reflections) connect back to the main table of contents, but in other places the links do not connect to preceding pages or to the original index page.
-Some of the external links to connecting websites do not connect.
Inadequate

-There are significant problems with portfolio navigation links and many sections (standards, artifacts, and reflections) do not connect back to the main table of contents or preceding pages or to the original index page.
-Many external links to connecting websites do not connect.
Layout and Text Elements

Superior

-The eportfolio is easy to read with appropriate visual organization of information using fonts, point size, bullets, italics, bold, and indentations for headings and sub-headings. -The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately.
-The background and colors enhance the readability of text.
Strong

-The eportfolio is mostly easy to read with appropriate visual organization of information using fonts, point size, bullets, italics, bold, and indentations for headings and sub-headings. -The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately.
-The background and colors enhance the readability of text.
Adequate

-The eportfolio is generally easy to read with appropriate visual organization of information using fonts, point size, bullets, italics, bold, and indentations for headings and sub-headings. A few minor format changes would improve readers' accessibility to the content.
-The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately in most places.
-The background and colors enhance the readability of text in most places
Weak

-The eportfolio is often difficult to read due to inappropriate visual organization of information using fonts, point size, bullets, italics, bold, and indentations for headings and sub-headings. Some formatting tools are under- or over-utilized and decrease the readers' accessibility to the content.
-The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space inappropriately in some places. -The background and colors are distracting in some places and decrease the readability of text.
Inadequate

-The eportfolio is difficult to read due to inappropriate visual organization of information using fonts, point size, bullets, italics, bold, and indentations for headings and sub-headings. Many formatting tools are under- or over-utilized and decrease the readers' accessibility to the content.
-The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space inappropriately and the content appears cluttered.
-The background and colors are distracting and decrease the readability of text.



Keywords:
  • ePortfolio



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n232