Skip to main content
iRubric: Problem Solving VALUE Rubric

iRubric: Problem Solving VALUE Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Problem Solving VALUE Rubric 
Problem Solving VALUE Rubric
Problem solving is the process of designing, evaluating and implementing a strategy to answer an open-ended question or achieve a desired goal. This rubric distills the common elements of most problem-solving contexts and is designed to function across all disciplines.
Rubric Code: QXW9427
By ebittel
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: (General)  
Type: (Other)  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate

Powered by iRubric Problem Solving VALUE Rubric
 

50 pts


40 pts


30 pts


20 pts


10 pts


0 pts

Define Problem

50

Using 3 or more sources, the student demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.
40

Using 3 or more sources, demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.
30

Using 2 or more sources, begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.
20

Using 1 or more sources, Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement or related contextual factors.
10

Using 1 source, Demonstrates no ability to identifying a problem statement or related contextual factors.
0

No attempt at defining problem.
Identify Strategies

50

Identifies multiple approaches for solving the problem that apply within a specific context.
40

Identifies multiple approaches for solving the problem, only some of which apply within a specific context.
30

Identifies only a single approach for solving the problem that does apply within a specific context.
20

Identifies one or more approaches for solving the problem that do not apply within a specific context.
10

Identifies no approach in solving the problem that do not apply within a specific context
0

No attempt at identifying strategies to solve problem.
Propose Solutions/Hypotheses

50

Proposes one or more solutions/hypotheses that indicates a deep comprehension of the problem.
40

Proposes one or more solutions/hypotheses that indicates comprehension of the problem.
30

Proposes one solution/hypothesis that is “off the shelf” rather than individually designed to address the specific contextual factors of the problem.
20

Proposes a solution/hypothesis that is difficult to evaluate because it is vague or only indirectly addresses the problem statement.
10

Proposes a solution/hypothesis that is difficult to evaluate because the solution does not address the problem statement.
0

No attempt at proposing solutions
Evaluate Potential Solutions

50

Evaluation of solutions is deep and elegant (for example, contains thorough and insightful explanation) and includes, deeply and thoroughly, all of the following: considers history of problem, reviews logic/reasoning, examines feasibility of solution, and weighs impacts of solution.
40

Evaluation of solutions is adequate (for example, contains thorough explanation) and includes the following: considers history of problem, reviews logic/reasoning, examines feasibility of solution, and weighs impacts of solution.
30

Evaluation of solutions is brief (for example, explanation lacks depth) and includes the following: considers history of problem, reviews logic/reasoning, examines feasibility of solution, and weighs impacts of solution.
20

Evaluation of solutions is superficial (for example, contains cursory, surface level explanation) and includes the following: considers history of problem, reviews logic/reasoning, examines feasibility of solution, and weighs impacts of solution.
10

Evaluation of solutions is superficial and includes none of the following: considers history of problem, reviews logic/reasoning, examines feasibility of solution.
0

No attempt at Evaluate Potential Solutions
Personal Reflection

50

Reviews results relative to the problem defined with thorough, specific considerations of need for further work.
40

Reviews results relative to the problem defined with some consideration of need for further work.
30

Reviews results in terms of the problem defined with little, if any, consideration of need for further work.
20

Reviews results superficially in terms of the problem defined with no consideration of need for further work.
10

Reviews results superficially in terms of the problem defined with no consideration of need for further work.
0

No attempt at a Personal Reflection



Keywords:
  • Problem solving, Contextual factors, Strategy, Solution

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n232