Skip to main content
iRubric: Working for the future: Computers for WCS rubric

iRubric: Working for the future: Computers for WCS rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Working for the future: Computers for WCS 
Written Action Plan
This rubric was used for assessing a project/program to see the progress in acquiring computers/internet access for Westside Christian School. It is understood that this project is an on-going project and that this rubric is assessing the progress and the focus of the project ensuring that many aspects are covered cohesively and thoroughly.
Rubric Code: Q59WW5
By sbooth05
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Status of Project
  Very Poor

The caveman cometh and stayeth

1 pts

Good

WCS may enter the 20th Century

3 pts

Nice Job

Strong possibilities for WCS

5 pts

Amazing

The future looks good for WCS

7 pts

Content & Development

Very Poor

- Content is incomplete.
- Major points about the project are not clear.
-Project does not address a true focus and plan of approach.
Good

- Content is not comprehensive.
- Major points of a project are addressed, but not well supported.
- Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.
Nice Job

- Content is fairly comprehensive. -Content is accurate and clearly presented.
- Major points are stated but are not well supported.
- Content and purpose of the writing are clear.
Amazing

- Content is comprehensive.
- Content is accurate and clearly presented
- Major points are stated and are well supported.
- Content and purpose of the writing are clear and explained fully.
Grant Applications

Very Poor

-Grant applications were not explained.
-Problems were not explained clearly.
Good

-Grant applications were explained.
-The grants were proposed, but problems were not explained clearly.
Nice Job

-A plan for applying for grants were clearly explained.
-The grants were followed, and problems were explained.
Amazing

-A plan for grants were clearly and specifically explained.
-The grants were followed, and problems were explained along with responses to the problems.
Sources

Very Poor

Sources are not mentioned.
Good

One source is mentioned but not in detail.
Nice Job

Sources are clearly mentioned but references are not cited.
Amazing

Sources are clearly mentioned and references are cited when and if necessary.
Timeline

Very Poor

Timeline is not mentioned.
Good

Timeline is briefly mentioned but little details given.
Nice Job

Timeline is clearly mentioned but pros and cons are not mentioned.
Amazing

Timeline is clearly mentioned and explained with major pros and cons noted.
Computer/Internet Needs of WCS.

Detailing how many computers/programs are necessary.
Very Poor

The needs of Westside Christian School are not mentioned.
Good

The needs of Westside Christian School are mentioned.
Nice Job

The needs and requirements of Westside Christian School are mentioned with little detailed.
Amazing

The needs and requirements of Westside Christian School is clearly noted and explained.
Educational/Technical Needs

NET Standards required
Very Poor

The educational/technical needs are not mentioned nor are the NET Standards.
Good

The educational/technical needs are mentioned; however, NET Standards are not mentioned.
Nice Job

The educational/technical needs are mentioned and NET Standards are referred to.
Amazing

The educational/technicial needs are clearly explained and NET Standards are noted.
Projection/Summary

Very Poor

There is no apparent summary for the project or a mention of future focus.
Good

A summary of the project is not clear and any future plans are not mentioned.
Nice Job

A summary of the project is clear and a future is clearly described. No other conceptual ideas for raising funds are mentioned.
Amazing

A summary of the project is clear and a future is clearly described. Other conceptual ideas for raising funds are mentioned.
Organization & Structure

Very Poor

- Organization and structure detract from the message of the project.
- The paper is disjointed and lacks transition of thoughts.
Good

- Structure of the paper is not easy to follow.
- Transitions need improvement.
Nice Job

- Structure of the paper is clear and easy to follow.
- Transitions are presented.
Amazing

- Structure of the paper is clear and easy to follow, and interesting.
- Transitions are excellent and aide the reader's understanding of the ideas presented.
Format

Very Poor

- Paper lacks or incorrectly uses many elements of correct MLA formattting.
- Essay is inadequate/excessive in length.
- Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.
-APA format is not followed
Good

- Paper follows most MLA guidelines.
- Paper is over/ under necessary.
- Paper contains few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors.
-APA format is loosely followed.
Nice Job

- Paper follows designated MLA guidelines with only minor errors.
- Paper is the appropriate length as described for the assignment.
- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed with a few exceptions; spelling is correct.
-APA format is clearly followed.
Amazing

-Paper follows designated MLA guidelines in all details without error.
- Paper is the appropriate length as described for the assignment.
-Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.
-APA format is correctly followed.



Keywords:
  • Community Research, Controversy, writing, English, MLA Format



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n232