Skip to main content

iRubric: Access to Justice Rubric #2

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Access to Justice Rubric #2 Paper Assignments Rubric Rubric Code: Q58B25 By vreyna75 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Political Science Type: Writing Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Criterion
	Poor--D 65 pts	Aveage - 72 pts	Average--C 78 pts	Average + 78 pts	Above Average - 82 pts	Above Average--B 85 pts	Above Average + 88 pts	Exceeding - 92 pts	Exceeding--A 95 pts	Exceeding + 98 pts
Question 1 25 %	Poor--D - Several questions are not answered. - Some major points are addressed, but not well supported. <BR> - Responses are inadequate or do not address questions.<BR> - Insufficient analyses/low-quality analyses are included. <BR> Does not mention anything about political power of defendants.	Aveage -	Average--C - Most questions are answered.<BR> - Some major points are stated and there is adequate support with some logic flaws.<BR> Does not tie political power to defendants, nor explains how it works. May mention either, but does not demonstrate level of understanding. - Some critical thinking presented for some questions.<BR> - Content and purpose of questions are adequately articulated with some clarity issues.	Average +	Above Average -	Above Average--B - All questions are answered.<BR> - Major points are stated.<BR> - Responses are adequate and address questions.<BR> - Content and purpose of questions are clearly articulated. - Analyses are sufficient in number but may not be well organized or as clear as they could be. <BR> - Some critical thinking presented for most questions.<BR> - Analyses are on topic but may not perfectly. Ties political power to defendants, but does	Above Average +	Exceeding -	Exceeding--A - All questions are answered.<BR> - Major points are stated clearly and are well supported.<BR> - Content and purpose of assignment are clearly articulated. - High level of critical thinking demonstrated.<BR> Ties political power to defendants and explains how it works.	Exceeding +
Question 2 25 %	Poor--D - Several questions are not answered. - Some major points are addressed, but not well supported. <BR> - Responses are inadequate or do not address questions.<BR> - Responses are inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought. - Insufficient analyses/low-quality analyses are included. <BR> Mentions either demographics or power, but does not connect them; fails to mention one or both.	Aveage -	Average--C - Most questions are answered.<BR> - Some major points are stated and there is adequate support with some logic flaws.<BR> - Responses are adequate and address questions.<BR> - Analyses are sufficient in number but may not be well organized or as clear as they could be. <BR> - Some critical thinking presented for some. Explains who the defendants are, but does not make a connection between demographics and power. Either may be mentioned but	Average +	Above Average -	Above Average--B - Analyses are sufficient in number but may not be well organized or as clear as they could be. <BR> - All questions are answered.<BR> - Major points are stated.<BR> - Responses are adequate and address questions.<BR> - Analyses are sufficient in number but may not be well organized or as clear as they could be. <BR> Explains who the defendants are and but minimally ties these demographics to power.	Above Average +	Exceeding -	Exceeding--A - All questions are answered.<BR> - Major points are stated clearly and are well supported.<BR> - Content and purpose of assignment are clearly articulated. - Analyses are organized logically, clearly presented, easy to understand by a lay reader, and directly address the questions posed.<BR> - High level of critical thinking demonstrated.<BR> Explains who are the defendants and ties these demographics (race, class, gender) to power.	Exceeding +
Question 3 25 %	Poor--D - Several questions are not answered. - Some major points are addressed, but not well supported. <BR> - Responses are inadequate or do not address questions.<BR> - Responses are inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought. - Insufficient analyses/low-quality analyses are included. <BR>. --Does not correctly or at all cover political culture or incorrectly ties it to the justice. Not present or incorrectly applied.	Aveage -	Average--C - Most questions are answered.<BR> - Some major points are stated and there is adequate support with some logic flaws.<BR> - Responses are adequate and address questions.<BR> - Some critical thinking presented for some --Mentions partially political culture or constitutional issues but does not tie them to the judicial system or lack of justice; may tie culture to quality of justice/lack of justice but incorrectly.	Average +	Above Average -	Above Average--B - All questions are answered.<BR> - Major points are stated.<BR> - Responses are adequate and address questions.<BR> - Some critical thinking presented for most questions.<BR> - Minor mistakes in data analysis.<BR> - Analyses are on topic but may not perfectly. May explain part of political culture and/or constitutional issues and ties them to either the quality of the judicial system and/lack of justice.	Above Average +	Exceeding -	Exceeding--A - All questions are answered.<BR> - Major points are stated clearly and are well supported.<BR> - Analyses are organized logically, clearly presented, easy to understand by a lay reader, and directly address the questions posed.<BR> - High level of critical thinking demonstrated.<BR> Correctly explains Texas political culture and constitutional issues that affect the quality of judicial system and lack of justice for defendants.	Exceeding +
Question 4 25 %	Poor--D - Several questions are not answered. - Some major points are addressed, but not well supported. <BR> - Responses are inadequate or do not address questions.<BR> - Responses are inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought. - Insufficient analyses/low-quality analyses are included. <BR> --Does not tie good democracy to improvements or incorrectly ties the two.	Aveage -	Average--C - Most questions are answered.<BR> - Some major points are stated and there is adequate support with some logic flaws.<BR> - Responses are adequate and address questions.<BR> - Analyses are sufficient in number but may not be well organized or as clear as they could be. <BR> - Some critical thinking presented for some. --attempts to tie good democracy to some improvements.	Average +	Above Average -	Above Average--B - All questions are answered.<BR> - Major points are stated.<BR> - Responses are adequate and address questions.<BR> - Analyses are sufficient in number but may not be well organized or as clear as they could be. <BR> - Some critical thinking presented for most questions.<BR> - Minor mistakes in data analysis.<BR> - Analyses are on topic but may not perfectly --Explains improvements to justice system, but may/not tie t	Above Average +	Exceeding -	Exceeding--A - All questions are answered.<BR> - Major points are stated clearly and are well supported.<BR> - Content and purpose of assignment are clearly articulated. - Analyses are organized logically, clearly presented, easy to understand by a lay reader, and directly address the questions posed.<BR> - High level of critical thinking demonstrated.<BR> Ties elements of good democracy to how the problems can be improved. Explains how good democracy wo	Exceeding +

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Accounting rubrics

More Exam rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n202