Skip to main content

iRubric: OAD106 Group Project Rubrics

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
OAD106 Group Project Rubrics OAD106 Group Project Rubrics Grading for Event Planning Group Project Rubric Code: P6687X By camm2436 Draft Public Rubric Subject: Business Type: Project Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Criterion
	Outstanding All criteria given are met. Work is thorough. 7 pts	Good Most criteria are met. Work is quite thorough. 5 pts	Acceptable Some criteria are not met. Work has some gaps that affect outcomes. 3 pts	Unacceptable Many criteria are not met. Work has noticeable gaps which will affect outcomes. 1 pts
Quality of Topics 10 pts Ideas presented are appropriate and realistically	Outstanding All ideas are possible and realistic for the scenario presented Appropriate audience and content Fully thought through	Good Two of three ideas are possible and realistic for the scenario presented Some appropriate audience and content Missing some elements	Acceptable One idea is possible and realistic for the scenario presented Mostly appropriate audience and content Mostly thought through	Unacceptable Three ideas are not possible and realistic for the scenario presented Not appropriate for audience and content Not thought through
Format - Idea 1 2 pts Follows format given in instructions	Outstanding All of -Title -Content -Format -Speakers, equipment... needed -Location -Length -Audience stated -Within budget ($150)	Good Most of: Title -Content -Format -Speakers, equipment... needed -Location -Length -Audience stated -Within budget ($150)	Acceptable Some of: Title -Content -Format -Speakers, equipment... needed -Location -Length -Audience stated -Within budget ($150)	Unacceptable Few of: Title -Content -Format -Speakers, equipment... needed -Location -Length -Audience stated -Within budget ($150)
Format - Idea 2 2 pts Follows format given in instructions	Outstanding All of -Title -Content -Format -Speakers, equipment... needed -Location -Length -Audience stated -Within budget ($150)	Good Some of: Title -Content -Format -Speakers, equipment... needed -Location -Length -Audience stated -Within budget ($150)	Acceptable Some of: Title -Content -Format -Speakers, equipment... needed -Location -Length -Audience stated -Within budget ($150)	Unacceptable Few of: Title -Content -Format -Speakers, equipment... needed -Location -Length -Audience stated -Within budget ($150)
Format - Idea 3 2 pts Follows format given in instructions	Outstanding All of -Title -Content -Format -Speakers, equipment... needed -Location -Length -Audience stated -Within budget ($150)	Good Some of: Title -Content -Format -Speakers, equipment... needed -Location -Length -Audience stated -Within budget ($150)	Acceptable Some of: Title -Content -Format -Speakers, equipment... needed -Location -Length -Audience stated -Within budget ($150)	Unacceptable Few of: Title -Content -Format -Speakers, equipment... needed -Location -Length -Audience stated -Within budget ($150)
Ideas Generated 3 pts Twelve Ideas were included in report	Outstanding Twelve ideas generated	Good	Acceptable	Unacceptable Twelve ideas not included
Grammar, Punctuation & Spelling 3 pts	Outstanding Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct. No major errors. Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.	Good Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation followed with minor errors only. Spelling is correct or would appear so to spellcheck tool.	Acceptable Paper contains no more than three major grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors. Language lacks clarity or includes the use of some jargon or conversational tone.	Unacceptable Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors. Language uses jargon or conversational tone.
Group Participation 3 pts Effectiveness as a team member - number derived from evaluations submitted by entire group (individually)	Outstanding Worked very well with everyone in the group Participated and listened very well Very flexible, made others feel very good about themselves	Good Worked well with most in the group Participated and listened okay Somewhat flexible, made some others feel good about themselves	Acceptable Worked well with others in the group Participated and listened well Flexible, made others feel good about themselves	Unacceptable Had difficulty working with some group members Participated and listened poorly Not flexible, did not make some others feel good about themselves

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Accounting rubrics

More Exam rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n202