Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: E Learning Evaluation rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
E Learning Evaluation
E Learning Evaluation
This rubric is designed to evaluate any type of E Learning experience. Whether it be through an online class, Web 2.0 tools, Online Simulation learning experience, and the list goes on. Specifically it was tested at the high school level undergrad, and graduate level.
Rubric Code:
P499X9
By
michelleaz
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
(General)
Type:
(Other)
Grade Levels:
(none)
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
E Learning Evaluation
Poor
1 pts
Fair
2 pts
Excellent
3 pts
Total
(N/A)
Learner Support & Resources
Poor
>Instructor was not available for student support.
>More than half of the online links did not work.
>Student Instructions and tasks were not clear.
Fair
>Instructor was available and answered any questions at his or her convenience.
>All links worked most of the time. >Student task and instructions were stated but confusing at times.
Excellent
>Instructor was readily available and answered any questions that came up in a timely manner.
>All links worked Correctly.
>Student task was clearly stated and all instructions were available and easy to follow.
Total
Program Organization and Design
Poor
>Student had significant trouble following the program and had to contact the professor for help.
>Design of the program was no consistent and very messy.
>Student disabilities were not taken into consideration.
Fair
>Program was confusing to follow which made it hard to adapt, but student could adapt over time.
>Design of the program was somewhat consistent but messy.
>Student disabilities are acknowledged and some are taken care of.
Excellent
>Program was easy to follow and adapt to. Student clearly understands the course and all its components.
>Design of the program is consistent throughout with clean lines.
>Student disabilities are taken into consideration and it is shown in the program.
Total
Coursework Delivery & Interaction
Poor
>Goals and learning objectives are not clearly defined.
>There is not student to student interaction or professor to student interaction.
>There are not critical thinking or problem solving skills developed.
Fair
>Goals of the program are somewhat defined as well as learning objectives.
>Student to Student interaction and Professor to student interaction happens periodically but not often.
>Some critical thinking skills and problems solving skills are developed through activities but not stressed.
Excellent
>Goals of the program are clearly defined as well as learning objectives.
>Interaction of students is encouraged, there are opportunities for interaction, as well as interaction with the Professor.
>Critical thinking skills and problem solving skills are developed through activities.
Total
Student Assessment & Evaluation
Poor
>Constructive feedback is not provided.
>Program has minimal or no assessment activities to monitor progress.
>Peer feedback is not available.
Fair
>Constructive feedback about students and their performance is provided but not on a regular basis.
>Program has assessment activities but they are not always affective at monitoring students progress.
>Peer evaluation is available but not encouraged.
Excellent
>Constructive feedback about students and their performance is provided regularly throughout the program.
>Program has appropriate assessment activities to monitor students progress.
>Peer feedback is available and encouraged throughout the course.
Total
Innovative Use of Technology
Poor
>Teaching methods do not engage the learner.
>Innovative technology is not used.
>There is minimal use of the world wide web.
Fair
>Teaching methods engage the learner fifty percent of the time.
>Innovative technology is used but only a few types.
>The world wide web is used in the courses but not encouraged.
Excellent
>Teaching methods are designed to engage the learner and enhance their learning experience.
>A variety of innovative technology is used to facilitate and aid in the learning process.
>The world wide web is actively used in the learning process and encouraged by the professor.
Total
Subjects:
(General)
Types:
(Other)
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More (General) rubrics
More (Other) rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n202
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.