Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Education Software Evaluation Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Education Software Evaluation Rubric
Education Software Evaluation Rubric
Evaluation of Education Software
Rubric Code:
P2X256W
By
elimuds
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
(General)
Type:
(Other)
Grade Levels:
(none)
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Software Evaluation
Poor
1 pts
Fair
2 pts
Good
3 pts
Excellent
4 pts
Comments
(N/A)
Curriculum Content
Poor
No relationship with curriculum content exists. Content does not meet goals or standards
Fair
Limited relationship with curriculum content. Content meets few goals or standards.
Good
Good relationship with curriculum content. Content meets some goals and standards.
Excellent
Direct relationship with curriculum content. Content meets most to all goals and standards.
Comments
Interactivity
Poor
Lacks enhancements to actively involve the learner.
Fair
Minimal enhancements to actively involve the learner.
Good
Contains some enhancements to actively involve the learner.
Excellent
Possess many enhancements that require learner to remain actively involved.
Comments
Critical Thinking
Poor
Student not given opportunity to engage in higher level thinking.
Fair
Student given limited opportunities to engage in higher level thinking.
Good
Student given some opportunity to engage in higher level thinking.
Excellent
Student given extensive opportunities to engage in higher level thinking activities.
Comments
Support Materials
Poor
Support materials do not exist. Technical support is inadequate. Unable to track student progress.
Fair
Limited options for assistance are given. Tracking student progress is available occasionally.
Good
Assistance is available but not quickly accessible. Additional resources are available and student progress can be frequently checked.
Excellent
Assistance is readily available at any point in the website and many additional sources are available with ease of keeping track of student progress.
Comments
Classroom Environment
Poor
No clear use of the software in regular classroom activities.
Fair
Few lessons can be used in the classroom setting and there are few suggestions for use of the material for whole class, individual or group lessons.
Good
Software can be integrated in classroom activities and there are suggested uses for whole class, individual and group lessons.
Excellent
All features can be used in classroom activities and the material includes activities for whole class, individual and group lessons.
Comments
Accessibility
Poor
Graphics/links are not labeled or don't offer rollover labeling, fonts are difficult to read and content does not lend itself to varied learning styles and ability levels.
Fair
Graphics/links are seldom labelled or seldom offer rollover labeling, fonts are sometimes used for ease of student reading and some content is accommodating to varied learning styles and ability levels.
Good
Graphics/links are mostly labeled or have rollover labeling, fonts are mostly easy to read and most content supports varied learning styles and ability levels.
Excellent
Graphics/links are labeled or have rollover labeling, fonts are consistently easy to read and varied learning styles and ability levels are accommodated.
Comments
Age/Grade Level
Poor
Directions, reading level, and product are inappropriate for targeted audience.
Fair
Directions, reading level, and product are are sometimes inappropriate for targeted audience.
Good
Directions, reading level, and product are are mostly appropriate for targeted audience.
Excellent
Directions, reading level and product are appropriate for targeted audience.
Comments
Effectiveness of Software
Poor
Design is confusing and is not navigable. The technology does not provide any benefit.
Fair
Design lacks intuition and is difficult to navigate. Minimal effectiveness.
Good
Design is clear, but assistance is needed to navigate some areas. Technology is adequately utilized to be of benefit in the instructional process.
Excellent
Design is clear, easy to navigate, logical and provides an effective means to help students achieve.
Comments
Assessment Component
Poor
Assessment is unrelated or not available.
Fair
Assessment does not engage learner and additional assessment is required.
Good
Assessment is usually appropriate and can provide some measure of what has been learned.
Excellent
Assessment is suited to goals and student ability and easily assesses what has been learned.
Comments
Teacher Accessibility
Poor
Software allows the teacher limited to no access to the monitoring of activities, assignments, assessments, and grades
Fair
Software allows the teacher moderate access to whole group monitoring of activities, assignments, assessments, and grades
Good
Software allows the teacher full access to whole group monitoring of activities, assignments, assessments, and grades
Excellent
Software allows the teacher full access to individual student monitoring of activities, assignments, assessments, and grades
Comments
Effectiveness in teaching
Poor
Software is ineffective in teaching desired content. Interactivity is unrelated to learning, not directed at student enjoyment.
Fair
Software is partially effective in teaching desired content, with limited interactivity and appeal to students.
Good
Software is mostly effective in teaching desired content, with some interactivity that appeals to students.
Excellent
Software is effective in teaching the desired content in an interactive way that students will enjoy while learning.
Comments
Speed
Poor
Students advance at a much too slow or too fast pace. Speed is not based on individual needs
Fair
Students advance at a slightly slow or fast rate. All students advance at the same speed.
Good
Students advance at a moderate rate. Most students advance at the same speed.
Excellent
Students advance at a speed that is appropriate to their individual learning needs
Comments
Subjects:
(General)
Types:
(Other)
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More (General) rubrics
More (Other) rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n60
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.