Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: CRNA Interview Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
CRNA Interview Rubric
Term Paper: Ethical Nursing Care
Rubric Code:
NXW76C8
By
billmocrna
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Medical
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate, Graduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Criterion
Poor
1 pts
Below Average
3 pts
Average
4 pts
Exceptional
5 pts
Content & Development
Poor
- Content is incomplete.<BR>
- Major points are not clear and /or missing.<BR>
Questions were not adequately answered.
Below Average
- Content is not comprehensive <BR>
- Major points are addressed, but not well supported. <BR>
- Responses are inadequate or do not address assignment.<BR>
- Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.
Average
- Content is accurate.<BR>
- Major points are stated.<BR>
- Responses are adequate and address assignment.<BR>
- Content and purpose of the writing are clear.
Exceptional
Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive.<BR>
- Major points are stated clearly and are well supported.<BR>
- Responses are excellent, timely and address assignment including course concepts.
Organization & Structure
Poor
- Organization and structure detract from the message.<BR>
- Paragraphs are disjointed and lack transition of thoughts.
Below Average
- Structure of the paper is not easy to follow. Paragraph transitions need improvement.<BR>
Conclusion is missing, or if provided, does not flow from the body of the paper.
Average
- Structure is mostly clear and easy to follow.<BR>
- Paragraph transitions are present.<BR>
- Conclusion is logical.
Exceptional
-Structure of the paper is clear and easy to follow.<BR>
Paragraph transitions are logical and maintain the flow of thought throughout the paper.<BR>
Conclusion is logical and flows from the body of the paper.
AMA Format
Poor
- Paper lacks many elements of correct formatting.<BR>
- Paper is inadequate/excessive in length.<BR>
-Paper is not double spaced
Below Average
- Paper follows most guidelines.<BR>
- Paper is over/ under word length.
Average
- Paper follows designated guidelines.<BR>
- Paper is the appropriate length as described for the assignment.<BR>
-Format is good.
Exceptional
- Paper follows all designated guidelines.<BR>
- Paper is the appropriate length as described for the assignment.<BR>
-Format enhances readability of paper.
Grammar, Punctuation & Spelling
Poor
- Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.<BR>
- Language uses jargon or conversational tone.
Below Average
- Paper contains few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors.<BR>
- Language lacks clarity or includes the use of some jargon or conversational tone.
Average
- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed with minor errors.<BR>
Spelling is correct.
Exceptional
- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.<BR>
- Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.
Ethical Issues
Poor
Concepts, assumptions, inferences, and conclusions are unclear, absent or flawed logic may be present. Structure and processes is minimal or absent.
Below Average
Concepts, assumptions, inferences, and conclusions are unclear and not thoroughly expressed.<BR>
Structure and processess are not as clear with unlimited relation to the term paper.
Average
Concepts, assumptions, inferences, and conclusions are expressed clearly in most cases but are not expressed thoroughly. Structure and processess are not as clearly defined but still have relation to the term paper.
Exceptional
Concepts, assumptions, inferences, and conclusions are clearly and thoroughly expressed.<BR>
Structure and processess are clearly defined.
Anesthesia Implications
Poor
Topic not discussed. No true anesthesia implications given.
Below Average
No implications given or discussed. Discussion irrevelant to topic.
Average
Few implications discussed.
Exceptional
Paper reads smoothly.<BR>
Discussion relevant and discussed throughly.
Subjects:
Accounting
Arts and Design
Biology
Business
Chemistry
Communication
Computers
Dance
Engineering
English
Finance
Foreign Languages
Geography
Geology
Health
History
Humanities
Journalism
Law
Math
Medical
Music
Philosophy
Physical Ed., Fitness
Physics
Political Science
Psychology
Science
Social Sciences
Nursing
(General)
Types:
Exam
Homework
Project
Presentation
Assignment
Writing
(Other)
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Accounting rubrics
More Exam rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n60
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.