Skip to main content
iRubric: Online Discussion Rubric

iRubric: Online Discussion Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Online Discussion Rubric 
Online Discussion Rubric
Online discussion assignments.
Rubric Code: NA2XW5
By gmacipc
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Law  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Online Discussion Rubric
  Fail

Fail equivalent 39 or less

0 pts

Pass

Equivalent to 40-49

0 pts

Good

`2:2 equivalent
50-59

0 pts

Very Good

2:1 equivalent
60-69

0 pts

Excellent

First class honours equivalent 70-100

0 pts

Identification of legal issues

Identifies and explains the issues raised in the Xtranormal problem scenario.
Fail

Fails to identify or demonstrate an awareness or understanding of any of issues presented in the Xtranormal problem scenario.
Pass

Limited identification of the issues. Demonstrates a limited awareness or understanding of any of issues presented in the Xtranormal problem scenario.
Good

Reasonable attempt to identify the issues. Understands some of the main issues presented in the Xtranormal problem scenario.
Very Good

Identifies and understands most of the issues presented in the Xtranormal animation
Excellent

Identifies and understands almost all of the issues presented in the Xtranormal animation
Laws and legal precedents

Identification and discussion of relevant legislation and case law pertaining to the issues raised in the Xtranormal problem scenario
Fail

Little or no evidence of identification or understanding of laws and legal precedents for the problem scenario.
Pass

Identifies, demonstrates and/or understands few of laws and legal precedents for the problem scenario
Good

A reasonable effort to identify, demonstrate and/or understands some of laws and legal precedents for the problem scenario
Very Good

Identifies, demonstrates and/or understands most of laws and legal precedents for the problem scenario
Excellent

Identifies, demonstrates and/or understands all of laws and legal precedents for the problem scenario
Analysis of Issues

For each issue, compare both existing legislation and case law with the facts presented in this case.
Fail

Was not able to analyse the issues using facts presented, laws and case precedents and/or was not able to separate issues for analysis.
Pass

Marginal analysis of each of the separate issues using the relevant facts, laws and case precedents and/or was not able to separate issues
Good

Somewhat thorough analysis of the issues presented using the facts presented, laws and case precedents and handled each of the issues separately prior to coming to an informed conclusion
Very Good

Reasonably thorough analysis of each of the issues using the facts presented, laws and case precedents and handled each of the issues separately prior to coming to an informed conclusion
Excellent

Very thorough and insightful analysis of each of the the issues using the laws and precedents and handled each of the issues separately prior to coming to an informed conclusion
Contribution to group discussion

Engagement in group discussion. Response to other group member's submissions. Asks relevant questions. Evidence of agreeing with, or challenging, other group members' comments.
Fail

No evidence of any contribution to the discussion. Fails to initiate the discussion. Fails to respond to other group member's comments. Simply
repeats the same point as other group members without providing reasons.
Pass

Some limited evidence of contribution to the discussion. Initiates some points in the discussion. Some evidence of having read and responded to other group member's comments.
Attempts to explain reasons for agreeing/disagreeing with other group members' comments.
Good

Evidence of a reasonable contribution to the discussion. Initiates a number of points in the discussion. Evidence of having read and responded to other group member's comments.
Explains reasons for agreeing/disagreeing with other group members' comments with reference to case law, academic literature or legislation.
Very Good

Good contribution to the discussion. Initiates many points in the discussion. Evidence of having read and responded to other group member's comments. Provides concise reasons for agreeing/disagreeing with other group members' comments.
Excellent

Excellent contribution to the discussion. Initiates almost all points in the discussion. Clear evidence of having read and responded to other group member's comments.
Excellent explanation of reasons for agreeing/disagreeing with other group members' comments with reference to case law, academic literature or legislation.
Frequency of online wiki post

Quantity of contributions to the online Wiki discussion
Fail

Fails to post to the discussion forum.
Pass

Posts once to the discussion forum and fails to reply to other group member's contributions. Post fails to develop group discussion.
Good

Posts at least once and includes a reply to other group member's contributions. Reasonable effort to develop group discussion.
Very Good

Posts more than once to the discussion forum and responds more than once to other group member's contributions. Post is well thought out and presents some interesting ideas to the group discussion.
Excellent

Consistently posts and responds to other group member's contributions. Post significantly enhances and develops group discussion. Post includes some innovative thoughts, ideas and substantial content to the group discussion.
Writing skills

Fail

Multiple spelling, punctuation or grammar errors
Pass

Less than 7 spelling, punctuation or grammar errors
Good

Less than 5 spelling, punctuation or grammar errors
Very Good

Less than 3 spelling, punctuation or grammar errors
Excellent

No spelling, punctuation or grammar errors



Keywords:
  • discussions online



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n232