Skip to main content
iRubric: Presentation Project Proposal rubric

iRubric: Presentation Project Proposal rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Presentation Project Proposal 
Paper/Project Proposal
Used for grading Presentation of paper/proposal for Social Legislation and project design
Rubric Code: N9W54W
By haverich23
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Social Sciences  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Requirements
  Poor

0 pts

Fair

60 pts

Good

80 pts

Excellent

100 pts

Content

Poor

- Content is incomplete.
- Major points are not clear.
-Content does not clearly describe project or proposal
Fair

- Content is not comprehensive.
- Major points of project are addressed, but not well supported.
-Purpose not clear
Good

- Content is fairly comprehensive. - -Content is accurate and clearly presented
- Major points are stated but are not well supported.
- Content and purpose of the writing are clear.
- Some relationship with theory, local context and findings
Excellent

- Content is comprehensive.
- Content is accurate and clearly presented
- Major points are stated and are well supported.
- Content and purpose of the writing are clear
- clear relationship with theory, local context and findings
Outline

Poor

- Organization and structure distracts or misleads
-Outline is disjointed and lacks transition of thought.
Fair

- Structure of outline of presentation is not easy to follow.
- Transitions need improvement.
Good

- Structure of the outline is clear and easy to follow.
- Transitions are smooth.
Excellent

- Structure of the outline is clear and easy to follow, and interesting.
- Transitions are excellent and aide the reader's understanding of the ideas presented.
Research & Needs assessment

Poor

- no references and no concrete evidence of research
Fair

Less than 4 references and some evidence of executed research
Good

- 4 to 7 references, at least 3 of which are scholarly texts or academic databases
- sufficient evidence of executed research
Excellent

- 9 or more references
-5 of which are reviewed journals, scholarly texts, or academic databases.
- multiple examples of evidence of the executed research and these examples are relevant and clearly delineated
Budget

Poor

- no mention of budget
Fair

- budget is presented but not supported with relevant information and it is not realistic
Good

- budget is presented is supportedby some information. However it is not realistic and it seems over the top and not convincing
Excellent

- budget is clearly presented. it is supported by relevant information and precise. It seems realistic and the team is convincing
Presentation techniques

Poor
Fair
Good
Excellent
Project

Poor
Fair

- The project objectives are described somewhat.
-The project activities are also briefly described and explained
Good

- The project objectives are described explicitly and comprehensively.
-The project activities are also described explicitly and comprehensively and there is a certain link between the objectives and the activities
Excellent

- The project objectives are described explicitly and comprehensively.
-The project activities are also described explicitly and comprehensively and there is a clear link between the objectives and the activities. The presentation includes arguments in support of the link and there is a cycle of project evaluation and it is correct
Sustainability

Poor

The sustainability of the project is mentioned briefly but not well argumented
Fair

The sustainability of the project is explicitly described
Good

The sustainability of the project is explicitly described and there are examples
Excellent

The sustainability of the project is explicitly described. There are examples and these examples are clearly illustrated and relevant for the Field of Social Work



Keywords:
  • Applied, Proposal, presenation



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n202