Skip to main content

- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Content Area Reading Fall 2010 Final Lesson Plan rubric

iRubric: Content Area Reading Fall 2010 Final Lesson Plan rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Content Area Reading Fall 2010 Final Lesson Plan Content Area Reading Fall 2010 Final Lesson Plan Content Area reading lesson plan modified with critical reading instructional objectives. Rubric Code: N6952W By gailmazyck Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Education Type: Project Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate, Graduate

Evaluation
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Average 3 pts	Above Average 4 pts	Excellent 5 pts	Score/30 (N/A)
Goals/Objectives/Strategies Students will learn: In other words, why is this important enough for you to teach and students to learn? How does it fit (map onto) what they already know or need to know? What will students do and/or construct or create to demonstrate that they learned the above?What are the before, during and after reading strategies students will use to critically read the texts?)	Poor The "teacher" fails to include instructional goals, performance objectives and critical reading strategies in the lesson	Fair The "teacher" includes instructional goals, but they are not aligned to MSDE standards; includes performance objectives, but they do not align with the goals; teacher omits reading strategies	Average The "teacher" includes instructional goals that are adequately aligned to MSDE standards, but not addressed properly in the lesson; the performance objectives are aligned with the goals and reading stratiegie are minimally integrated in the lesson	Above Average The "teacher" includes instructional goals aligned to MSDE standards, and they are addressed properly in the lesson; the performance objectives align with the goals, and critical reading strategies are integrated throughout the lesson	Excellent The "teacher" includes instructional goals aligned to MSDE standards, and they are addressed superbly throughout the lesson; teacher uses Bloom's taxonomy to align performance objectives to meet the goals; critical Before, During and After reading strategies are extremely well integrated in the lesson	Score/30
Vocabulary and Background Knowledge (Prepare a list of relevant words students are expected to learn as part of the lesson.)	Poor The "teacher" fails to include a list of vocabulary and academic terms needed to navigate the text and does not build background knowledge	Fair The "teacher" fails to include a list of vocabulary or academic terms needed to navigate the text; or does not build background knowledge	Average The "teacher" minimally includes a list of vocabulary and academic terms needed to navigate the text, and builds background knowledge without connecting to the lesson	Above Average The "teacher" adequately includes a list of vocabulary and academic terms needed to navigate the text, but they may not be related to the instructional goals; teacher builds background knowledge	Excellent The "teacher" includes a list of vocabulary and academic terms needed to navigate the text, and they are closely aligned to the instructional goals. Teacher superbly builds background knowledge of the reader/student	Score/30
Lesson Activities/Prep/Materials (This is the body of the lesson that includes an Introduction, Procedures, Closure/Summary for each day.) (List what needs to be prepared/collected before teaching the lesson; include the needs of the students)	Poor The "teacher" fails to include a detailed introduction, procedures and closure. The "teacher" fails to include preparation and materials/supplies.	Fair The "teacher" fails to include an detailed introduction, procedures and/or closure. The "teacher" fails to include preparation or materials/supplies.	Average The "teacher" includes an introduction, procedures and closure, but supporting details are lacking. The "teacher" adequately includes preparation and materials/supplies.	Above Average The "teacher" includes an introduction, procedures and closure, with supporting details. The "teacher" properly explains and includes preparation and materials/supplies	Excellent The "teacher" includes an introduction, procedures and closure, with elaborate supporting details for each section. The "teacher" explains and includes preparation and materials/supplies in the lesson plan in great detail.	Score/30
Modifications (What accommodations will the teacher make for inclusion students (special needs), gifted and talented students, English language learners, etc., to ensure success for all students (instructional planning: simplified to more complex)?	Poor Teacher fails to provide modification	Fair Teacher provides modification of 1 of the following: content, process, product or environment	Average Teacher provides modification of 2 of the following: content, process, product or environment	Above Average Teacher provides modification of 3 of the following: content, process, product or environment	Excellent Teacher provides modification for all of the following: content, process, product and environment	Score/30
Rubrics/Evaluations (A rubric is to be used for students’ self-evaluation and/or for the teacher’s evaluation/grading.). Formative (assessments and tests given during instruction to monitor learning progress, detect learning errors, and provide feedback to students and teachers).Summative (assessment or test given at the end of a unit or course to measure the extent to which the intended learning outcomes and performance standards have been achieved).	Poor Teacher fails to provide a rubric, and does not include formative or summative assessment	Fair Teacher provides a rubric, but only includes a summative assessment	Average Teacher provides a rubric, but only includes a formative assessment	Above Average Teacher provides a rubric, and includes a formative and summative assessment	Excellent Teacher provides a rubric, and includes a formative assessments throughout the lesson, as well as a summative assessment at the end of the unit or lesson	Score/30
References (Include annotated references (a minimum of three (3)) with page(s) cited. Consider citing at least one (1) up-to-date text and two (2) recent journal articles.	Poor Teacher fails to include three citations	Fair Teacher includes three citations, but does not include 2 recent journal articles	Average Teacher includes three citations, and includes 1 recent journal articles, but does not use APA style reference	Above Average Teacher includes three citations, includes 2 recent journal articles and uses APA style reference	Excellent Teacher includes three citations, including a recent text, 2 recent journal articles and uses APA style reference	Score/30

Keywords:

During reading strategies, Explicit instruction, modeling, scaffolding, direct explanation, guided practice, independent application

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Arts and Design rubrics

More Project rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.

n232