Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Recreation Assessment Paper rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Recreation Assessment Paper
Reaction Paper Rubric
The objective of this assignment is to get you to reflect on a previous outdoor recreation experience and consider both the benefits you received from the experience and the benefits provided by outdoor recreation to individuals, groups, and society. What was the experience like for you? What did you gain from participating? Did the experience change you in any way?
Rubric Code:
N4X8W9
By
tjmiller
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Physical Ed., Fitness
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Criterion
Excellent
50 pts
Good
40 pts
Acceptable
30 pts
Poor
20 pts
Content
Excellent
Content addresses assignment including course concepts:
-Describes Self Benefits
-Describes Benefits to groups & society
-Reflects on an exceptional outdoor recreation experience.
-offers vivid details and storytelling
Good
Content is adequate and addresses assignment.
-Describes Self Benefits
-Describes Benefits to Society
-Reflects on an average outdoor recreation experience.
-lacking details and storytelling
Acceptable
Content addresses assignment components minimally or inadequately
-Describes a few Self Benefits
-Describes a few Benefits to Society
-Reflects on an poor example of an outdoor recreation experience.
-lacking details and storytelling
Poor
The content is incomplete.
-Describes no Self Benefits
-Describes no benefits to Society
-lacks the reflection on an example of an outdoor recreation experience.
-lacking details and storytelling
Research
Excellent
-Current within the last 10 years
-Cited in text properly
-Sources are scholarly, peer-reviewed, academic journals or industry reports.
-Research is focused on your personal benefits mentioned in the paper.
Good
-Current within the last 15 years
-Most citations are correct and proper style
-Sources are valid journals, national publications
Acceptable
-Current within the last 20 years
-A few citations, mixed correctness, attempted to cite properly
-Sources are websites, news sites, non-verifiable
-source is within the top 5 results of a simple Google search
Poor
-Archaic research
-Citations are missing or erroneous
-No sources, or use of general knowledge basic data.
-source is within the top 3 results of a simple google search
Format & Structure
Excellent
-Format enhances the readability of the paper.
Strong intro, body, and conclusion
- Paragraph transitions are logical and maintain the flow of thought throughout the paper.
-The conclusion is logical and flows from the body of the paper.
Good
-The format flows decently
- Structure is mostly clear and easy to follow.
- Paragraph transitions are present.
-The conclusion is logical.
Acceptable
-Format is difficult to follow
- Structure of the paper is not easy to follow.
- Paragraph transitions need improvement.
- Conclusion is missing, or if provided, does not flow from the body of the paper.
Poor
-Paper lacks most elements of correct formatting.
- Organization and structure detract from the message of the writer.
- Paragraphs are disjointed and lack transition of thoughts.
Grammar, punctuation, & spelling
Excellent
- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.
- Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.
-Structure of the paper is clear and easy to follow.
Good
- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed with minor errors.
Spelling is correct.
- Structure is mostly clear and easy to follow.
- Paragraph transitions are present.
- Conclusion is logical.
Acceptable
- Paper contains few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors.
- Language lacks clarity or includes the use of some jargon or conversational tone.
Poor
- Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.
- Language uses jargon or a conversational tone.
Subjects:
Health
History
Medical
Philosophy
Physical Ed., Fitness
Political Science
Psychology
Science
Social Sciences
(General)
Types:
Exam
Homework
Project
Presentation
Assignment
Writing
(Other)
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Health rubrics
More Exam rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n60
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.