Skip to main content
iRubric: History of Couture Houses - Written Paper rubric

iRubric: History of Couture Houses - Written Paper rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
History of Couture Houses - Written Paper 
Art History Research Paper Rubric
Rubric Code: N4BB5B
By dianemc
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Arts and Design  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Criterion
  Excellent

5

(N/A)

Very Good

4

(N/A)

Average

2

(N/A)

Poor

2

(N/A)

Unacceptable

1

(N/A)

Points

(N/A)

Summary
25 %

Excellent

- Students demonstrate an outstanding ability to use research and course materials to gather details concerning the Couture House, Designers and Designs
- argument is coherent and well supported by referenced sources
Very Good

- Students demonstrate an adequate ability to use research and course materials to gather details concerning the Couture House, Designers and Designs
- argument is coherent and supported by referenced sources
Average

- Students demonstrate a limited ability to use research and course materials to gather details concerning concerning the Couture House, Designers and Designs
- argument is coherent and supported by referenced sources
Poor

- Students demonstrate little or no ability to use research and course materials to gather details concerning the Couture House, Designers and Designs
- argue with little understanding of their research topic
Unacceptable

- Student either did not submit the assignment or was unable to demonstrate enough knowledge to receive credit for the discussion.
Points
Content & Development
25 %

Excellent

- Key styles fully identified: Designer, intro date. (and medium if central to discussion)
- Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive.
- Formal analysis is clear and well integrated
- Major points are stated clearly and are well supported.
- Responses are excellent, timely and address assignment including course concepts.
- Content and purpose of the writing are clear.
Very Good

-Key styles fully identified: Designer, intro date. (and medium if central to discussion)
- Content is accurate and persuasive.
- Formal analysis is clear
- Major points are stated and supported.
- Responses are adequate and address assignment.
- Content and purpose of the writing are clear.
Average

- Key styles fully identified: Designer, intro date. (and medium if central to discussion)
- Content is not comprehensive and /or persuasive.
- Formal analysis included but vague.
- Major points are addressed, but not well supported.
- Responses are inadequate or do not address assignment.
- Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.
Poor

- Key styles not fully identified: Designer, intro date. (and medium if central to discussion)
- Content is incomplete.
- Formal analysis unclear and over/under the lenth necessary for an appropriate description.
- Major points are not clear and /or persuasive.
- Questions were not adequately answered.
Unacceptable

- Key styles not identified: Designer, intro date. (and medium if central to discussion)
- No formal analysis
- Student either didn't submit the assignment or was unable to demonstrate enough knowledge to receive credit for the assignment.
Points
Organization & Structure
25 %

Excellent

-Structure of the paper is clear and easy to follow.
-Thesis statment is clear and relates clearly to the content of the paper
- Paragraph transitions are logical and maintain the flow of thought throughout the paper.
- Conclusion is logical and flows from the body of the paper.
Very Good

- Structure is mostly clear and easy to follow.
-Thesis statement is clear and relates to content of the paper. Few
- Paragraph transitions are present.
- Conclusion is logical.
Average

- Structure of the paper is not easy to follow.
- Paragraph transitions need improvement.
- Conclusion is missing, or if provided, does not flow from the body of the paper.
Poor

- Organization and structure detract from the message of the writer.
- Paragraphs are disjointed and lack transition of thoughts.
- Conclusion is missing.
Unacceptable

- Unacceptable
- No identifiable thesis.
- Student either didn't submit the assignment or was unable to demonstrate enough knowledge to receive credit for the assignment.
Points
Format and Length
15 %

Excellent

- Paper follows a MLA citation style consistently
- Paper is the appropriate length as described for the assignment.
- Format enhances readability of paper.
Very Good

- Paper follows a MLA citation style consistently
- Paper is the appropriate length as described for the assignment.
- Format is good.
Average

- Paper follows a MLA citation style, some errors.
- Paper is over/ under page length.
Poor

- Paper does not follow any citation style,
- Paper is inadequate/excessive in length.
-Paper is not double spaced
Unacceptable

- Unacceptable
- Paper does not follow a citation style and there are no citations.
- Student either didn't submit the assignment or was unable to demonstrate enough knowledge to receive credit for the assignment.
Points
Grammar, Punctuation & Spelling
10 %

Excellent

- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.
- Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.
Very Good

- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.
- Language is clear; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.
Average

- Paper contains few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors.
- Language lacks clarity or includes the use of some jargon or conversational tone.
Poor

- Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.
- Language uses jargon or conversational tone.
Unacceptable

- Unacceptable
- Student either didn't submit the assignment or was unable to demonstrate enough knowledge to receive credit for the assignment.
Points






Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n232