iRubric: UbD Unit Design Feedback Form rubric

Mentor texts are irrelevant to the type of writing being taught. Fewer than 3 are included

Mentor texts are somewhat relevant to the type of writing being taught. Fewer than 5 are included

Mentor texts are very relevant to the type of writing being taught. More than 5 are included and are listed in APA format.

Learning activities are limited in scope throughout the unit. In turn, this hinders the ability for differentiating material, engaging all learners, and making appropriate accommodations for students.

Learning activities have a moderate level of diversity throughout the unit. Potential for some differentiation is present. Activities are varied in a manner that will engage and accommodate the differing interests, styles, and abilities of MOST learners. The sequence of the learning activities is organized in an acceptable manner.

There are a variety of learning activities throughout the unit. These activities have the potential to be differentiated when necessary. Activities are varied in a manner that will engage and accommodate the differing interests, styles, and abilities of all learners. The sequence of the learning activities has been organized in a manner that will maximize student engagement and productivity.

Basic scoring tools are incorporated into the unit. These tools are not applicable to self-assessment and/or lack the appropriate criteria for helpful evaluation.

Emerging level, Criterion-based scoring tools for self-assessment and for the evaluation of products and performances are present

Appropriate and helpful criterion-based scoring tools for self assessment and for evaluating products and performances are present.

There are more than 5 grammar, spelling or citation errors. Sources are not listed.

There are 3-5 grammar, spelling, or citation errors. Some sources are listed.

There are fewer than 3 grammar, spelling, or citation errors. All sources are listed in APA format.