iRubric: Philosophy of Education rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Philosophy of Education Writing Rubric Rubric Code: MX3ABA By gonzalez_m Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: (General) Type: Assignment Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Targets
	Unacceptable 0 pts	Developing 1 pts	Adequate 2 pts	Distinguished 3 pts
Relevance/Authenticity	Unacceptable No relevance to context of teaching and learning.	Developing Minimal relevance overlapping concepts.	Adequate Consistently relevant to educational context. Minimal overlap.	Distinguished Outstanding authenticity/relevance. No overlap. Range of content outstanding.
Belief to Practice	Unacceptable No attempt to connect “belief” and “practice	Developing Weak connection of belief and practice. No specific practices provided.	Adequate Definite connection of belief and practice. Range could be broadened. Some specific practices provided.	Distinguished Strong connection of belief and practice with explicit, realistic and clearly defined practices. Numerous specific practices provided.
Development of Statement	Unacceptable No system or order. Random thoughts with no organizational pattern.	Developing Thoughts are minimally organized and development of philosophical context is weak.	Adequate Has a logical organizational pattern and conveys a sense of wholeness with minimal lapses.	Distinguished Logical organizational pattern throughout with no lapses in development.
Focus/Supporting Philosophies	Unacceptable Information/ideas are inconsistent and interfere with the meaning of the text. No supporting philosophical premises. (i.e. constructivism progressivism)	Developing Minimal focus with significant extraneous and loosely related material. Oblique relevance to supporting philosophy.	Adequate Maintains adequate focus with one well aligned supporting philosophy noted.	Distinguished Logical organizational pattern throughout with no lapses in development. Maintains consistent focus with two or more supporting and strongly aligned supporting philosophies.
Conventions	Unacceptable Numerous errors in sentences structure, punctuation and capitalization as well as incorrectly spelled words	Developing Minimal errors in sentence structure. Three to five errors in punctuation, capitalization and spelling.	Adequate All sentences are complete. Two or less errors in punctuation, capitalizations and spelling. Paragraphing is correct.	Distinguished All sentences are complete and fluent. No errors in punctuation, capitalization or spelling. Paragraphing aids in the communication of position.