Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Evidenced Based Practice Paper rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Evidenced Based Practice Paper
Evidenced Based Practice Paper
Objective: Gain an understanding of evidenced based practice in relation to patient safety and quality improvements. Description: Based on your clinical experience, you are to write a paper concerning a topic from the provided list. The paper MUST be written from a NURSING perspective. Describe the background of the problem, perform a modified literature review, and a typical patient care scenario with a plan of care.Finally, compare and contrast the evidenced based plan with the actual St. Elizabeth policy. Refer to the following rubric for grading guidelines.
Rubric Code:
M64548
By
ElaineK
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Nursing
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Criterion
Poor
5 pts
Below Average
10 pts
Average
15 pts
Exceptional
20 pts
Background information
Poor
- Content is incomplete.
- Major points are not clear and /or missing.
Questions were not adequately answered.
Below Average
- Content is not comprehensive
- Major points are addressed, but not well supported.
- Responses are inadequate or do not address assignment.
- Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.
Average
- Content is accurate.
- Major points are stated.
- Responses are adequate and address assignment.
- Content and purpose of the writing are clear.
Exceptional
Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive.
- Major points are stated clearly and are well supported.
- Responses are excellent and address assignment including course concepts.
Literature Review
Poor
- Organization and structure detract from the message.
- Paragraphs are disjointed and lack transition of thoughts.
-There are (3) or more journal articles that are more than 5 years old. Online resources are not reliable or peer-reviewed.
Below Average
- Structure of the paper is not easy to follow. Paragraph transitions need improvement.
Conclusion is missing, or if provided, does not flow from the body of the paper.
-Less than 4 journal articles are reviewed
-Articles are not research based or peer-reviewed
Average
- Structure is mostly clear and easy to follow.
- Paragraph transitions are present.
- Conclusion is logical.
-Review of at least (4) journal articles.
Exceptional
-Structure of the paper is clear and easy to follow.
Paragraph transitions are logical and maintain the flow of thought throughout the paper.
Conclusion is logical and flows from the body of the paper.
All references are less than 5 years old.
Plan of Care
Poor
Interventions are not related to the chosen topic. No intext citations provided.
Medical interventions provided not nursing interventions.
Below Average
Interventions are incomplete or not appropriate for topic. Few intext citations provided.
Average
Identifies 1-2 specific nursing interventions for each outcome. Interventions are individualized to the client. Interventions focus appropriately on the etiology of the nursing diagnosis and reflect how the nurse will assist the client in meeting the outcomes.
Exceptional
Identifies 3-4 or more specific interventions for each outcome. Interventions are clearly linked to outcomes and focus specifically on the etiology of the nursing diagnosis. Oucomes clearly reflect what the nurse will do to help the client meet the outcomes and are supported by citations.
Discussion
Poor
Topic not discussed. No true nursing implications given. Discussion of actual vs. best treatment as supported by literature is weak and incomplete.
There is no clear explanation of whether or not the patient's treatment agrees with literature and there are no additonal recommendations or references cited.
Below Average
No implications given or discussed. Discussion irrevelant to topic. Only 1 reference cited.
Average
Few implications discussed. Comparisons given but not discussed throughly.
There is discussion of actual treatment vs. best treatment as supported by literature but it is incomplete.
Student does not point out how improvements may be made or support for current practice.
Exceptional
There is a complete discussion of the actual treatment of the patient vs. best treatment as supported by the cited literature.
*Student discusses if and how he/she would care for this patient differently based on these findings.
*If the literature supports recommended treatment the student defends the current practice.
Criterion
Poor
2.5 pts
Below Average
5 pts
Average
7.5 pts
Exceptional
10 pts
Scenario
Poor
-Content is incomplete or not related to chosen topic.
Below Average
-Scenario is brief and does not contain assessment or demographical information.
Average
-Scenario is appropriate to chosen topic and contains assessment and demographical information.
Exceptional
-Scenario is well developed and appropriate to chosen topic and contains assessment and demographical information.
APA Format, Grammar, Punctuation &
Poor
- Paper lacks many elements of correct formatting.
- Paper is not double spaced
-No in text citation provided
- Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.
- Language uses jargon or conversational tone.
Below Average
- Paper follows most guidelines.
-Paper contains few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors.
- Language lacks clarity or includes the use of some jargon or conversational tone.
Average
- Paper follows designated guidelines.
-Format is good.
- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed with minor errors.
Spelling is correct.
Exceptional
- Paper follows all designated guidelines.
- Format enhances readability of paper.
-- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.
- Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.
Subjects:
Accounting
Arts and Design
Biology
Business
Chemistry
Communication
Computers
Dance
Engineering
English
Finance
Foreign Languages
Geography
Geology
Health
History
Humanities
Journalism
Law
Math
Medical
Music
Philosophy
Physical Ed., Fitness
Physics
Political Science
Psychology
Science
Social Sciences
Nursing
(General)
Types:
Exam
Homework
Project
Presentation
Assignment
Writing
(Other)
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Accounting rubrics
More Exam rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n202
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.