iRubric: Representing "Satire" with "Glogster" rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Representing "Satire" with "Glogster" Representing "Satire" with "Glogster" Develop a glog in which you incorporate different elements of satire. Your glog should include a correct definition of satire, present classical examples(such as authors), and also show knowledge of modern day satire examples. Try to give at least three examples of satire through the two time frames, including images or video clips. A clear understanding of the material should be shown through your blog by providing relevant examples and explaining why at least one of the examples represents satire. Rubric Code: M49976 By ehbeagle Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Project Grade Levels: (none)

Glog Poster Student Production
	POOR 1 pts	FAIR 2 pts	WELL DONE 3 pts	EXEMPLARY 4 pts
CONTENT DEPTH-COMPLEXITY understanding of satire shown through examples and text	POOR Needs more information or more accurate information, Information was insufficient or irrelevant , very simple	FAIR Valid content but little depth or elaboration;sparse information and presentation, Simple, basic information; limited critical thinking is evident	WELL DONE Covers topic effectively;well developed;explores the topic beyond facts and details, Critical thinking evident;compares and contrasts; integrates topics, time or disciplines	EXEMPLARY Precise data;in-depth; well-supported; develops complex concepts and relationships,Beyond expected level; analyzes multiple perspectives and issues,abstract thinking
PRESENTATION Interactive, Engaging, Memorable	POOR soft voice, hard to understand, weak, poor confidence and competence, poor eye contact, unclear directions	FAIR normal voice tone, some eye contact, some confidence and competence, unclear directions	WELL DONE Passion in voice some of the time, good eye contact, confident and competent, clear directions	EXEMPLARY Excited about topic, great eye contact; very confident and competent, clear directions
GRAPHICS/VIDEO pictures, videos, etc.	POOR little to no examples;examples do not correlate with satire, nor depict it correctly	FAIR only one or more graphic/video; the graphics or videos barely correlate to satire, and do not efficiently describe the subgenre	WELL DONE Multiple graphics/videos;effectively uses examples to depict satire and the page is well designed/layed out	EXEMPLARY Mutliple graphics/videos;correlates perfectly with the subgenre. page design is engaging and cohesive
COHESIVENESS overall flow of the glog	POOR Missing items; disorganized, messy	FAIR Adequate; needs more work and attention to detail, somewhat organized	WELL DONE Attractive and Appealing; neat and complete, easy to follow & understand,	EXEMPLARY Eye catching, and organized, beyond expectations.