iRubric: Class Discussion rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Class Discussion Class Discussion Students are expected to complete the assigned reading and come to class fully prepared to discuss and critically analyze the reading material. Each class member is responsible for finding answers to questions that arise to enhance her own learning and the learning. Because of the format of this experiential learning opportunity, class discussion will be an even more critical component of this course. Each class will be spent discussing reading, experiences, reflections, and interviews we have had with individuals living in Ecuador. Rubric Code: L6X52A By weberg Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Social Sciences Type: (Other) Grade Levels: (none)

Discussion Rubric
	5 5 pts	4 4 pts	3 3 pts	2 2 pts	1 1 pts
Participation 2 pts	5 Participatant encourages and motivates interaction with other students & instructor, doesn't dominate.	4 Initiates and responds to other student & instructor comments.	3 Occasionally responds to other students &/or instructor.	2 Responds to instructor prompts only	1 No participation.
Quality of Response 2 pts	5 Participation relates to main topic and adds new concepts, ideas, or information	4 Relates to main topic with some supporting details.	3 Participation clearly relates to main topic, but has a minimum of supporting detail.	2 Participation clearly relates to main topic, but lacks details or examples.	1 Participation contains minimal information or relevancy to main topic.
Professional Language 2 pts	5 Use of professional vocabulary occurs consistently and comfortably,	4	3 Use of professional vocabulary occurs but not consistently.	2	1 Participation involves unprofessional vocabulary &/or tone.
Critical Thinking / Ethic of Reason 2 pts	5 Participation consistently shows evidence of critical/reflective thinking &/or ethical reasoning, yet can be light and fun also.	4 Participation shows critical thinking/reflective thinking &/or ethical reasoning most of the time	3 Participation shows minimal critical thinking/reflective thinking &/or ethical reasoning	2 Participation lacks evidence of critical thinking/reflective thinking &/or ethical reasoning.	1 Participation lacks evidence of critical/reflective thinking or ethical reasoning.