Skip to main content
iRubric: Art History Research Paper Rubric

iRubric: Art History Research Paper Rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Art History Research Paper Rubric 
Use this rubric for grading college Art History papers. Can be customized for any subject.
Rubric Code: L3C656
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Arts and Design  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Criterion
  Excellent

90-100

(N/A)

Very Good

80-89

(N/A)

Average

70-79

(N/A)

Poor

60-69

(N/A)

Unacceptable

0-59

(N/A)

Summary and Submission
20 %

Excellent

- Student demonstrates an outstanding ability to use details from course materials and discusses the meaning of those details to support the connections between the period, style and the artist of the work and the factors that led to them.
- Student submitted the assignment on time to Turnitin.com and the course.
Very Good

- Student demonstrates an adequate ability to use details from course materials and discusses the meaning of those details to support the connections between the period, style and the artist of the work and the factors that led to them.
- Student submitted the assignment on time to Turnitin.com and the course.
Average

- Student demonstrates a limited ability to use details from course materials and discusses the meaning of those details with an inadequate understanding of making connections between the period, style and the artist of the work and the factors that led to them.
- Student submitted the assignment on time to Turnitin.com and the course.
Poor

- Student demonstrates little or no use of details from course materials and discusses the meaning of those details with little understanding of making connections between the period, style and the artist of the work and the factors that led to them.
- Student failed to submit the assignment on time to Turnitin.com and the course or did not submit the assignment to Turnitin.com.
Unacceptable

- Student either did not submit the assignment or was unable to demonstrate enough knowledge to receive credit for the discussion.
Content & Development
20 %

Excellent

- Art fully identified: Title; artist, medium; date.
- Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive.
- Major points are stated clearly and are well supported.
- Responses are excellent, timely and address assignment including course concepts.
- Content and purpose of the writing are clear.
Very Good

- Art fully identified: Title; artist; medium; date.
- Content is accurate and persuasive.
- Major points are stated.
- Responses are adequate and address assignment.
- Content and purpose of the writing are clear.
Average

- Art fully identifed: Title; artist; medium; date.
- Content is not comprehensive and /or persuasive.
- Major points are addressed, but not well supported.
- Responses are inadequate or do not address assignment.
- Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.
Poor

- Art not fully identified: Title; artist; medium; date.
- Content is incomplete.
- Major points are not clear and /or persuasive.
- Questions were not adequately answered.
Unacceptable

- Art not identified and unacceptable.
- Student either didn't submit the assignment or was unable to demonstrate enough knowledge to receive credit for the assignment.
Organization & Structure
20 %

Excellent

-Structure of the paper is clear and easy to follow.
- Paragraph transitions are logical and maintain the flow of thought throughout the paper.
- Conclusion is logical and flows from the body of the paper.
Very Good

- Structure is mostly clear and easy to follow.
- Paragraph transitions are present.
- Conclusion is logical.
Average

- Structure of the paper is not easy to follow.
- Paragraph transitions need improvement.
- Conclusion is missing, or if provided, does not flow from the body of the paper.
Poor

- Organization and structure detract from the message of the writer.
- Paragraphs are disjointed and lack transition of thoughts.
- Conclusion is missing.
Unacceptable

- Unacceptable
- Student either didn't submit the assignment or was unable to demonstrate enough knowledge to receive credit for the assignment.
Format and Length
20 %

Excellent

- Paper follows all MLA designated guidelines.
- Paper is the appropriate length as described for the assignment.
-Format enhances readability of paper.
Very Good

- Paper follows MLA designated guidelines.
- Paper is the appropriate length as described for the assignment.
-Format is good.
Average

- Paper follows most MLA guidelines.
- Paper is over/ under word length.
Poor

- Paper lacks many elements of correct MLA formatting.
- Paper is inadequate/excessive in length.
-Paper is not double spaced
Unacceptable

- Unacceptable
- Student either didn't submit the assignment or was unable to demonstrate enough knowledge to receive credit for the assignment.
Grammar, Punctuation & Spelling
20 %

Excellent

- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.
- Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.
Very Good

- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.
- Language is clear; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.
Average

- Paper contains few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors.
- Language lacks clarity or includes the use of some jargon or conversational tone.
Poor

- Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.
- Language uses jargon or conversational tone.
Unacceptable

- Unacceptable
- Student either didn't submit the assignment or was unable to demonstrate enough knowledge to receive credit for the assignment.










Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n60